New Design
  1. Enable New Design

The $220 fine that's catching Aussies off guard: Why jaywalking enforcement is suddenly serious business

Offtopic / Everything else

The $220 fine that's catching Aussies off guard: Why jaywalking enforcement is suddenly serious business

compressed-darwin-boaventura-jFQu92NE2YY-unsplash.jpeg The $220 fine that's catching Aussies off guard: Why jaywalking enforcement is suddenly serious business
Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for jaywalking in Sydney, catching many pedestrians completely off guard. Image source: Darwin Boaventura / Unsplash.

You might think twice about darting across the road next time you're out and about.



Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for a range of offences that are colloquially known as jaywalking in Sydney, catching many pedestrians completely off guard with the strict enforcement of laws many didn't even know existed.





While jaywalking might sound like something from an American crime drama, it's very much a reality here in Australia—and one that can seriously lighten your wallet. The recent enforcement blitz has left many wondering: when did crossing the road become such serious business?



What exactly counts as jaywalking?



In traffic law matters, this refers to the act of crossing a street or road outside of a designated crosswalk or crossing against a traffic signal. Jaywalking is illegal and can result in various fines.



The specifics might surprise you. You're legally obliged to cross a road by taking the shortest, safest route possible, with Section 230 of the Road Rules 2014 providing a fine of up to $220 for pedestrians who contravene this rule.



You can be fined for:











  • Crossing within 20 metres of traffic lights or pedestrian crossings
  • Crossing when facing a red pedestrian signal
  • Not taking the shortest, safest route across the road
  • Staying on the road longer than necessary to cross safely
  • Creating a hazard or obstruction for other road users





'We can be fined for jaywalking, but it's rarely enforced unless it happens in a major city and they have made a deliberate effort to look out for the behaviour'

Avinash Singh, traffic lawyer



The cost of a quick dash across the street



The financial sting varies significantly depending on where you get caught. Here's what you're looking at across Australia:




State-by-state jaywalking fines


NSW: $75-$220 on-the-spot fine, up to $2,200 if contested in court


Victoria: Up to $384 (2 penalty units at $192.31 each)


Queensland: $52-$57 fine


Western Australia: $50 fine


South Australia: $51 fine


Tasmania: $42 fine


*Note: Fines may vary and penalty unit values are adjusted annually




NSW has the highest on-the-spot fine, with unsuccessful court challenges potentially resulting in a maximum penalty of $2,200, making it a costly mistake indeed.



When enforcement gets serious



Don't let the relative rarity of enforcement fool you into thinking it's not a real risk. In the past three years, some 10,000 pedestrians have been fined for crossing roads in New South Wales alone, with NSW Police's 'Operation Franklin' dishing out a whopping $120,000 worth of fines, mainly targeting Sydney's CBD.









The enforcement tends to come in concentrated bursts. Police will often make a point by organising 'blitzes', some of which can last weeks or even months, with one such blitz focused on jaywalking in the Sydney CBD resulting in 4,480 people being given tickets between July 2013 and July 2014.



What's particularly frustrating for many is the enforcement can occur even when there's no actual danger. Police have focused on those who cross the road when the pedestrian light is red—even handing-out tickets when no cars are around, with pedestrians able to be fined even if there is absolutely no traffic and no conceivable danger to any road user.



The surprising history behind jaywalking laws



Here's something that might interest those who've witnessed the evolution of our car-centric cities: jaywalking laws weren't always about safety—they were about profit and control.









Did you know?


Did you know?
The term 'jaywalking' and the laws behind it were largely created by the automobile industry in the 1920s. The word 'jay' was slang for an ignorant country person, and the auto industry used public relations campaigns to shame pedestrians and shift blame for accidents from drivers to walkers. The first major jaywalking law was passed in Los Angeles in 1925, drafted with help from the auto lobby.



Before the widespread adoption of the automobile, streets functioned as dynamic public spaces shared by pedestrians, horse-drawn carts, street vendors, and playing children, with foot traffic having a natural right to the road. The introduction of cars disrupted this order, leading to a dramatic increase in pedestrian fatalities, which numbered over 17,000 in 1923 alone.



Automobile manufacturers and motoring clubs launched a coordinated public relations effort in the 1920s to redefine streets as places primarily for cars and shift blame for accidents from drivers to pedestrians. This campaign promoted the term 'jaywalking,' using the word 'jay' - early 20th-century slang for an ignorant country person—to publicly shame pedestrians who walked in the street.



How we compare to the old country



For those with ties to the UK, there's a stark difference in approach. While Brits can generally cross roads freely without fear of legal repercussions, Australia has adopted the American model of strict pedestrian regulation.









In many countries, such regulations do not exist and jaywalking is an unknown concept, but Australia has fully embraced these laws as part of our road safety approach.



What this means for your daily walks



The reality is, most of us have probably jaywalked at some point—and 'most people would be guilty of occasionally ducking across the road without a 'green man' flashing' - but the recent enforcement uptick means it's worth being more mindful.




Smart pedestrian habits to avoid fines



  • Always use designated crossings when they're within 20 metres

  • Wait for the green pedestrian signal, even if no traffic is visible

  • Take the shortest, most direct route across the road

  • Don't linger on the roadway longer than necessary

  • Be especially cautious in CBD areas where enforcement is more common

  • Remember that being caught depends largely on police campaigns and location




A law enforcement tool or safety measure?



The debate continues about whether jaywalking enforcement is genuinely about safety or revenue raising. More Australians die from the common flu than from crossing the road, with most of the 169 pedestrian deaths in the year to July being the result of drink driving and drivers on their phones—rather than bad judgement on behalf of the pedestrian.









Fining people who are not causing any danger may be seen as unfair, and even as making a mockery of the law. It is suggested that the law could be amended to require some evidence that the pedestrian was actually causing a danger, rather than simply allowing police to make offenders out of just about everyone in the community.



The changing tide elsewhere



Interestingly, while Australia maintains strict jaywalking enforcement, some US states have moved to decriminalise the practice. California's Freedom to Walk Act prevents officers from issuing jaywalking tickets unless a pedestrian's crossing creates immediate and specific danger of collision, with states like Virginia and Nevada passing similar laws reflecting an evolving view that crossing mid-block is not always unsafe.



What This Means For You


The enforcement reality means that while you might go months or years without seeing a jaywalking fine, when police decide to focus on it, they do so intensively. Your best bet is to stick to the rules—not just for safety, but to avoid becoming part of the next enforcement statistics.



What's your take on jaywalking laws? Have you ever been caught out by enforcement, or do you think the fines are justified for safety reasons? Share your experiences with crossing the road Down Under!





  • Original Article


    https://au.news.yahoo.com/little-kn...-attracting-220-fine-im-guilty-024405549.html





  • Jaywalking In NSW (Fines & Rights Explained by Traffic Lawyer) - Hamilton Janke Lawyers

    Cited text: Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for a range of offences that are colloquially known as jaywalking.


    Excerpt: Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for a range of offences that are colloquially known as jaywalking



    https://www.hamiltonjanke.com.au/jaywalking/





  • Jaywalking in Australia: Should You or Should You Not? | JB Solicitors

    Cited text: In traffic law matters, this refers to the act of crossing a street or road outside of a designated crosswalk or crossing against a traffic signal. Ja...


    Excerpt: In traffic law matters, this refers to the act of crossing a street or road outside of a designated crosswalk or crossing against a traffic signal.



    https://jbsolicitors.com.au/jaywalking-in-australia/





  • Jaywalking In NSW (Fines & Rights Explained by Traffic Lawyer) - Hamilton Janke Lawyers

    Cited text: ... Did you know that you’re legally obliged to cross a road by taking the shortest, safest route possible? Section 230 of the Road Rules 2014 provide...


    Excerpt: You're legally obliged to cross a road by taking the shortest, safest route possible, with Section 230 of the Road Rules 2014 providing a fine of up to $220 for pedestrians who contravene this rule.



    https://www.hamiltonjanke.com.au/jaywalking/





  • Is Jaywalking Illegal in Australia?

    Cited text: The fine for jaywalking varies from state to state: NSW: A fine for jaywalking in NSW is $76. If unsuccessfully contested the maximum penalty for jayw...


    Excerpt: NSW has the highest on-the-spot fine, with unsuccessful court challenges potentially resulting in a maximum penalty of $2,200



    https://astorlegal.com.au/is-jaywalking-illegal-in-australia/





  • Jaywalking Is Australia's Most Ridiculous, Money-Grabbing Crime

    Cited text: In the past three years though some 10,000 pedestrians have been fined for crossing roads in New South Wales alone. During this time, NSW Police’s “Op...


    Excerpt: In the past three years, some 10,000 pedestrians have been fined for crossing roads in New South Wales alone, with NSW Police's 'Operation Franklin' dishing out a whopping $120,000 worth of fines, mainly targeting Sydney's CBD.



    https://www.vice.com/en/article/jaywalking-is-australias-most-ridiculous-money-grabbing-crime/





  • Thousands Fined for Jaywalking: A Cash-Grab or Public Safety Issue? - Downing Centre Court

    Cited text: But police will often make a point that certain laws exist by organising ‘blitzes’, some of which can last weeks or even months. One such blitz focuse...


    Excerpt: Police will often make a point by organising 'blitzes', some of which can last weeks or even months, with one such blitz focused on jaywalking in the Sydney CBD resulting in 4,480 people being given tickets between July 2013 and July 2014.



    https://downingcentrecourt.com.au/b...cash-grab-or-public-safety-issue/?print=print





  • Thousands Fined for Jaywalking: A Cash-Grab or Public Safety Issue? - Downing Centre Court

    Cited text: This year, police have focused on those who cross the road when the pedestrian light is red—even handing-out tickets even when no cars are around.


    Excerpt: Police have focused on those who cross the road when the pedestrian light is red—even handing-out tickets when no cars are around, with pedestrians able to be fined even if there is absolutely no traffic and no conceivable danger to any…



    https://downingcentrecourt.com.au/b...cash-grab-or-public-safety-issue/?print=print





  • Thousands Fined for Jaywalking: A Cash-Grab or Public Safety Issue? - Downing Centre Court

    Cited text: Under the law, a pedestrian can be fined even if there is absolutely no traffic around and there is no conceivable danger to any road user.


    Excerpt: Police have focused on those who cross the road when the pedestrian light is red—even handing-out tickets when no cars are around, with pedestrians able to be fined even if there is absolutely no traffic and no conceivable danger to any…



    https://downingcentrecourt.com.au/b...cash-grab-or-public-safety-issue/?print=print





  • Why Is Jaywalking Illegal? The History and Fines—LegalClarity

    Cited text: Before the widespread adoption of the automobile, streets in American cities functioned as dynamic public spaces. They were shared by pedestrians, hor...


    Excerpt: Before the widespread adoption of the automobile, streets functioned as dynamic public spaces shared by pedestrians, horse-drawn carts, street vendors, and playing children, with foot traffic having a natural right to the road.



    https://legalclarity.org/why-is-jaywalking-illegal-the-history-and-fines/





  • Why Is Jaywalking Illegal? The History and Fines—LegalClarity

    Cited text: In response to this negative perception, automobile manufacturers and motoring clubs launched a coordinated public relations effort in the 1920s. This...


    Excerpt: Automobile manufacturers and motoring clubs launched a coordinated public relations effort in the 1920s to redefine streets as places primarily for cars and shift blame for accidents from drivers to pedestrians.



    https://legalclarity.org/why-is-jaywalking-illegal-the-history-and-fines/





  • Jaywalking—Wikipedia

    Cited text: In many countries, such regulations do not exist and jaywalking is an unknown concept.


    Excerpt: In many countries, such regulations do not exist and jaywalking is an unknown concept



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaywalking





  • Jaywalking In NSW (Fines & Rights Explained by Traffic Lawyer) - Hamilton Janke Lawyers

    Cited text: While most people would be guilty of occasionally ducking across the road without a ‘green man’ flashing, did you know that you could face fines of up...


    Excerpt: 'most people would be guilty of occasionally ducking across the road without a 'green man' flashing'



    https://www.hamiltonjanke.com.au/jaywalking/





  • Jaywalking Is Australia's Most Ridiculous, Money-Grabbing Crime

    Cited text: But, really, more Australians die from the common flu than from crossing the road. Of the 169 pedestrian deaths in the year to July, most are result o...


    Excerpt: More Australians die from the common flu than from crossing the road, with most of the 169 pedestrian deaths in the year to July being the result of drink driving and drivers on their phones—rather than bad judgement on behalf of the…



    https://www.vice.com/en/article/jaywalking-is-australias-most-ridiculous-money-grabbing-crime/





  • Thousands Fined for Jaywalking: A Cash-Grab or Public Safety Issue? - Downing Centre Court

    Cited text: Fining people who are not causing any danger may be seen as unfair, and even as making a mockery of the law. It is suggested that the law could be ame...


    Excerpt: Fining people who are not causing any danger may be seen as unfair, and even as making a mockery of the law.



    https://downingcentrecourt.com.au/b...cash-grab-or-public-safety-issue/?print=print





  • Why Is Jaywalking Illegal? The History and Fines—LegalClarity

    Cited text: In recent years, this has led to a significant shift in some states, which have moved to decriminalize the practice. For example, California’s Freedom...


    Excerpt: some US states have moved to decriminalise the practice.



    https://legalclarity.org/why-is-jaywalking-illegal-the-history-and-fines/



Last edited:

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
One more instance of revenue raising. If there is no traffic in sight, what is the danger if a person crosses the road away from a zebra crossing or against the red light? None. So, that makes it definitely revenue raising.
 
One more instance of revenue raising. If there is no traffic in sight, what is the danger if a person crosses the road away from a zebra crossing or against the red light? None. So, that makes it definitely revenue raising.
Dear member Elaine41, thankyou for your post. The only way to avoid any fine what so ever, and to avoid any confrontation with the police, is very easy, just obey the law that was created for everyones safety. If you dont agree with revenue raising, you are in control , just obey the law and keep the revenue in your pocket. It's really not that hard to walk a couple of metres to a zebra crossing or pedestrian light crossing. Laws have not been soley created for revenue raising. If we did not have so many road rules, there would be dead people all over the roads. So, place the road rules and revenue in a scale and see which is the one that is saving lives. Have a beautiful week. 🙏🦋
 
One more instance of revenue raising. If there is no traffic in sight, what is the danger if a person crosses the road away from a zebra crossing or against the red light? None. So, that makes it definitely revenue raising.
So when driving we should be able to drive through a red light when no one else is there?
Or not actually stop at a stop sign because we can see no one is there?
Or drive at 150 on a deserted freeway?

So you feel you are above the law? Maybe burglary should be okay if they steal something you don't want?
Did you actually read the article, it said rarely people are fined anyway, so how is it "revenue raising" if it's rarely fined?
 
So when driving we should be able to drive through a red light when no one else is there?
Or not actually stop at a stop sign because we can see no one is there?
Or drive at 150 on a deserted freeway?

So you feel you are above the law? Maybe burglary should be okay if they steal something you don't want?
Did you actually read the article, it said rarely people are fined anyway, so how is it "revenue raising" if it's rarely fined?
Dear member Greg350, thankyou for your post. Your post has been perfectly stated. Have a great week. 🙏🦋
 
About time the pedestrians were disciplined, instead of blaming cars drivers when pedestrians are hit while crossing the roads using their phones.
 
They should fine all the protesters that block City roads, as they are definitely causing an obstruction.
 
Dear member Elaine41, thankyou for your post. The only way to avoid any fine what so ever, and to avoid any confrontation with the police, is very easy, just obey the law that was created for everyones safety. If you dont agree with revenue raising, you are in control , just obey the law and keep the revenue in your pocket. It's really not that hard to walk a couple of metres to a zebra crossing or pedestrian light crossing. Laws have not been soley created for revenue raising. If we did not have so many road rules, there would be dead people all over the roads. So, place the road rules and revenue in a scale and see which is the one that is saving lives. Have a beautiful week. 🙏🦋
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
So when driving we should be able to drive through a red light when no one else is there?
Or not actually stop at a stop sign because we can see no one is there?
Or drive at 150 on a deserted freeway?

So you feel you are above the law? Maybe burglary should be okay if they steal something you don't want?
Did you actually read the article, it said rarely people are fined anyway, so how is it "revenue raising" if it's rarely fined?
Rarely fined? I thik you should read the article again.

I recall a clip from a NSW channel a couple of years ago - three pigs running (jaywalking) across a road to arrest and handcuff (with more force than was required)1 man who jaywalked.


Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for a range of offences that are colloquially known as jaywalking in Sydney, catching many pedestrians completely off guard with the strict enforcement of laws many didn't even know existed.
Don't let the relative rarity of enforcement fool you into thinking it's not a real risk. In the past three years, some 10,000 pedestrians have been fined for crossing roads in New South Wales alone, with NSW Police's 'Operation Franklin' dishing out a whopping $120,000 worth of fines, mainly targeting Sydney's CBD.
The enforcement tends to come in concentrated bursts. Police will often make a point by organising 'blitzes', some of which can last weeks or even months, with one such blitz focused on jaywalking in the Sydney CBD resulting in 4,480 people being given tickets between July 2013 and July 2014.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
Rarely fined? I thik you should read the article again.

I recall a clip from a NSW channel a couple of years ago - three pigs running (jaywalking) across a road to arrest and handcuff (with more force than was required)1 man who jaywalked.


Police fined over 100 people during a 6-hour period in June this year for a range of offences that are colloquially known as jaywalking in Sydney, catching many pedestrians completely off guard with the strict enforcement of laws many didn't even know existed.
Don't let the relative rarity of enforcement fool you into thinking it's not a real risk. In the past three years, some 10,000 pedestrians have been fined for crossing roads in New South Wales alone, with NSW Police's 'Operation Franklin' dishing out a whopping $120,000 worth of fines, mainly targeting Sydney's CBD.
The enforcement tends to come in concentrated bursts. Police will often make a point by organising 'blitzes', some of which can last weeks or even months, with one such blitz focused on jaywalking in the Sydney CBD resulting in 4,480 people being given tickets between July 2013 and July 2014.
Dear member Kman, thankyou for your post. Some people are ignorant to the laws that exist to save their lives. You obviously come from a place where laws for roads don't exist. Each and every citizen, who received a fine should consider themselves lucky to have received the fine. Why, because they will now think twice before breaking the law. You seem to be so fixated to on the monetary fine aspect, rather than understanding the part where people who break the law on roads, are risking their lives. Oh, l can not recall saying anything about rarely fined, re-read my post before you point your little finger. By the way, is it you who is writing your posts or your sheep baaaasaaaaaaaa. Have a great week. 🙏🦋
 
Dear member Kman, thankyou for your post. Some people are ignorant to the laws that exist to save their lives. You obviously come from a place where laws for roads don't exist. Each and every citizen, who received a fine should consider themselves lucky to have received the fine. Why, because they will now think twice before breaking the law. You seem to be so fixated to on the monetary fine aspect, rather than understanding the part where people who break the law on roads, are risking their lives. Oh, l can not recall saying anything about rarely fined, re-read my post before you point your little finger. By the way, is it you who is writing your posts or your sheep baaaasaaaaaaaa. Have a great week. 🙏🦋
You really don't understand. Police do have a quota that the are obliged to fill every day. Over and above they get bonuses.

These jaywalking fines have now reached plague proportions in the last 5? years.

And thank you for your extremely uninciteful ad unsolicited clap trap.
You are most welcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
You really don't understand. Police do have a quota that the are obliged to fill every day. Over and above they get bonuses.

These jaywalking fines have now reached plague proportions in the last 5? years.

And thank you for your extremely uninciteful ad unsolicited clap trap.
You are most welcome.
Dear member Kman, thankyou for your post. The only way the police can fill their quota everyday is if people are breaking the law. Stop looking at the issue back to front. If everyone obeyed the law, what becomes of that daily quota you mentioned. Have a good evening. 🙏🦋
 
Police have focused on those who cross the road when the pedestrian light is red—even handing-out tickets when no cars are around, with pedestrians able to be fined even if there is absolutely no traffic and no conceivable danger to any road user.

I have personally seen this exact practice in action about five years ago on Clayton Road, Clayton, in south east Melbourne.

A female senior constable and a male sergeant (!) issuing infringement notices to pedestrians who crossed the road against a don't walk sign.

At the same time, less than 500 metres from where they were "operating", a middle aged man was murdered in broad daylight in a side street.

I suspect that collecting thousands of dollars in infringements is much easier than apprehending a violent criminal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
Dear member Elaine41, thankyou for your post. The only way to avoid any fine what so ever, and to avoid any confrontation with the police, is very easy, just obey the law that was created for everyones safety. If you dont agree with revenue raising, you are in control , just obey the law and keep the revenue in your pocket. It's really not that hard to walk a couple of metres to a zebra crossing or pedestrian light crossing. Laws have not been soley created for revenue raising. If we did not have so many road rules, there would be dead people all over the roads. So, place the road rules and revenue in a scale and see which is the one that is saving lives. Have a beautiful week. 🙏🦋
You are obviously a member of the part of govt which receives all this additional revenue. Have a good day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
You are obviously a member of the part of govt which receives all this additional revenue. Have a good day.
Dear member Elaine41, thankyou for your post. Actually I am an elderly senior citizen, barely able to walk. I happily raised two of my own children and when they were sick with tonsalitis or have been diagnosed with type 1 Diabetes, my first priority was to be beside my children in their time of pain and distress. Have a good evening. 🙏🦋
You are obviously a member of the part of govt which receives all this additional revenue. Have a good day.
Dear member Elaine41, no matter how much you carry on, you will never be above the law, so for your own peace of mind and for the good of all, just obey the laws that are created in Parliament to save lives. 🙏🦋
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parrot
those who cross the road in between cars are SELFISH PEOPLE because
9 times out of 10 there is a crossing within reach but hey they don’t want to walk another 10/15 steps extra when they can get directly to where they need to be .
Instead of Councils concentrating on putting out their people to stick tickets on people’s Cars 🛻
Why don’t they put someone to watch and fine people for crossing in between Cars..
They would still get their revenue. 💰💰
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×