Is this $250 Million Loophole Making Australia’s Roads More Dangerous? What You Need to Know Before Your Next Drive

If you’ve noticed the roads getting a bit more crowded—and the vehicles getting a whole lot bigger—you’re not imagining things. Australia is in the midst of a mega-ute and SUV boom, and it’s not just a matter of personal taste or changing lifestyles. There’s a $250 million loophole quietly fuelling this trend, and it’s costing all of us in more ways than one.

Let’s take a closer look at what’s really going on, why it matters, and what could be done to steer things in a safer, fairer direction.


The Luxury Car Tax Loophole: Why Big Utes and SUVs Get a Free Pass


1748576807835.png
A $250 million tax loophole encouraging oversized vehicle purchases is being criticised by experts and governments urged to act. Credit: Reddit/Facebook


First, a quick refresher: Australia’s luxury car tax (LCT) is designed to make buyers of high-end vehicles pay a little extra. If you buy a car worth more than $80,576 (as of this financial year), you’re hit with a hefty tax on the amount above that threshold. The idea is to make luxury cars a bit less attractive and to help level the playing field.


But here’s the kicker: most utes and SUVs are classified as 'light commercial vehicles,' and that means they’re exempt from the LCT—no matter how plush, powerful, or pricey they are. Whether you’re a tradie hauling tools or a city dweller using your dual-cab for the school run, you get the same tax break.

Associate Professor Milad Haghani, an expert in urban resilience at the University of Melbourne, says this loophole is a major reason why so many Aussies are choosing to 'go big' when buying a new car. 'If somebody is looking at a price range of $80,000 and above, there’s really an incentive to buy a pick-up truck or big car because then they get exempted from the whopping 30 per cent luxury tax, and it becomes quite attractive to the buyer,' he explains.

And let’s be honest: most of these vehicles aren’t being used for commercial purposes. They’re family cars, weekend warriors, and status symbols.


Who’s Really Paying the Price?

Here’s where it gets interesting—and a bit concerning. The Australian Institute estimates that this loophole costs taxpayers about $250 million every year. That’s money that could be going to schools, hospitals, or even fixing the potholes these heavy vehicles help create.

But the costs don’t stop there. Research shows that bigger vehicles have a much greater impact on road wear and tear, congestion, and pollution. In fact, Prof Haghani points out that a large ute, which can be twice the size of a small car, causes up to 16 times more road damage. That’s thanks to the 'fourth power law' in pavement engineering: double the axle weight, and you get 16 times the impact.


So, in effect, every taxpayer is subsidising the purchase and ongoing impact of these mega-utes and SUVs—even if you’re still happily driving your trusty hatchback.

A Nation of Big Cars: How Did We Get Here?

It wasn’t always this way. Less than 25 years ago, most Aussies drove small passenger vehicles—sedans, hatchbacks, and the like. Fast forward to today, and those cars make up just 17 per cent of new sales. A whopping 80 per cent of new vehicles sold are now SUVs, utes, vans, or light trucks.


Why the shift? Partly, it’s the tax loophole. But it’s also about changing tastes, clever marketing, and a sense that bigger is better (or at least safer). Yet, as city streets fill up with American-style pickups and oversized SUVs, not everyone is thrilled.

Cities Push Back: Are Mega-Utes Too Big for Our Streets?

Some local councils are starting to fight back. In Melbourne, the Yarra City Council voted to investigate higher parking fees for large vehicles, inspired by Paris’s move to charge big SUVs $30 an hour to park in the city centre. Greens Councillor Sophie Wade summed it up: 'The city’s streets simply weren’t designed for this kind of vehicle.'


It’s not just about parking, either. Standards Australia is even considering whether to increase the size of standard carpark spaces to accommodate the new normal.

Should Registration Fees Reflect Vehicle Size and Use?

Prof Haghani and other experts argue that it’s time for a rethink on how we charge for road use. Right now, only NSW and WA factor in vehicle weight when setting registration fees. Queensland and Tasmania use engine cylinders as a rough proxy, while Victoria bases fees on location.


A fairer system, they say, would consider not just the size and weight of the vehicle but also how often it’s driven. After all, a massive ute that’s only used on weekends is a different beast from one that’s pounding the pavement every day.

What’s Next? A Road User Charge on the Horizon

The federal government is already hinting at new road charges for certain drivers, and the debate is heating up. Should we close the luxury car tax loophole? Should big vehicles pay more to reflect their true cost to society? Or is this just another example of the 'nanny state' gone mad?

What Does This Mean for Seniors?

For many over-60s, the rise of mega-utes and SUVs is a mixed bag. On one hand, these vehicles can offer comfort, visibility, and a sense of safety. On the other, they make parking trickier, increase congestion, and can be intimidating for pedestrians and drivers of smaller cars.

If you’re in the market for a new car, it’s worth considering not just the upfront cost but the ongoing impact—on your wallet, your community, and the environment.

Key Takeaways
  • Critics are calling for state and federal governments to address a $250 million loophole that exempts most large utes and SUVs from the luxury car tax, encouraging Aussies to buy oversized vehicles.
  • The current tax exemption means taxpayers are effectively subsidising big car purchases, which are causing increased road damage, congestion, and environmental pollution.
  • Experts highlight that large vehicles, such as American-style utes and trucks, cause disproportionately more road damage due to their weight and want registration fees to better reflect vehicle size and usage.
  • Despite rising consumer demand for big cars, some local councils and road safety advocates are pushing for higher charges and restrictions for oversized vehicles, arguing existing infrastructure wasn’t designed for them.
Have you noticed more big utes and SUVs on your local roads? Do you think the luxury car tax loophole should be closed? Would you support higher registration or parking fees for oversized vehicles? Or do you think Aussies should be free to drive whatever they like, tax breaks and all? Let us know in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
The larger the tyres are the more damage they do?? Large tyres also make more noise. Yes notice it more in narrower streets where buildings are closer together. In SA back in the days when panel vans were popular registration was cheaper if you proved that is was only used for private use. I know somebody who used one for overnight camping. By getting it inspected they got cheaper registration. Some people buy twin cab utes and put canopies on the back strictly for personal use only. I don't know if it affects registration fees or not
 
Please everyone stop thing about the impact of large vehicles in the heavily populated areas. If people living in rural and remote areas were to be penalized for driving a large vehicle it would be criminal. These people require a larger/heavier vehicle to withstand the poor quality of the roads and distances they are required to drive just for day to day living. Any form of increased cost would need to be inversely proportional to the distance from municipalities with public transport and/or better roads.
 
If they think that they are that much of a problem around our communities.....then ban the sale of them in our country......there are new models still around of smaller vehicles that can do the job that they have always done....and for existing large Utes and SUV type vehicles make them pay more with a yearly road tax determined by the relevant authorities based upon their usage throughout the year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dragonladyg
Please everyone stop thing about the impact of large vehicles in the heavily populated areas. If people living in rural and remote areas were to be penalized for driving a large vehicle it would be criminal. These people require a larger/heavier vehicle to withstand the poor quality of the roads and distances they are required to drive just for day to day living. Any form of increased cost would need to be inversely proportional to the distance from municipalities with public transport and/or better roads.
A larger vehicle is less prone to damage on poor roads than a smaller vehicle? Umm....

Only in the case of ground clearance. A larger vehicle is inherently heavier and one would expect such a vehicle to have suspension components to stand up to the task. Not always the case.

Try the Mitsubishi Pajero, Range Rover, Ram, Silverado, Amarok and Jeep. Designed and manufactured in countries that do not have the rough terrain that Australia dishes up. What is the use of a vehicle with 4WD capability that is only at home on smooth sealed roads?
 
How many people have tried to safely fit 3 babyseats / boosterseats on the back passenger seat??? Obviously not many. Some cars 2 children in those restraints and ONE small child will fit on the rear seat without being squashed. They just fit on the width of an early Holden Commodore seat. They are pushed against each other and almost touching the doors. They will not fit on later model standard cars. People Movers and Large 4WDs they will fit safely. 4WDs also have larger cargo/boot space
 
  • Like
Reactions: RobertHarris59
Please everyone stop thing about the impact of large vehicles in the heavily populated areas. If people living in rural and remote areas were to be penalized for driving a large vehicle it would be criminal. These people require a larger/heavier vehicle to withstand the poor quality of the roads and distances they are required to drive just for day to day living. Any form of increased cost would need to be inversely proportional to the distance from municipalities with public transport and/or better roads.
Unfortunately, town people have these large SUV`s, and when they get behind you, they think they own the road, and just about sit in my Sedan boot. I always make sure I am doing the speed limit, but no these AH`s think they own the road. And yes, for towing the Larger Caravans etc, they are great, but not in the town. Just for a run about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie1
So if you have worked hard and paid more taxes you are hit with added tax when you purchase a car with the money left over after tax?? Where is the incentive to get rich? You already pay for any extra education to become a more preferred employee, then you cannot escape having to pay again when you are able to enjoy the fruits of your labour. Best to stay on a government hand out
 
Unfortunately, town people have these large SUV`s, and when they get behind you, they think they own the road, and just about sit in my Sedan boot. I always make sure I am doing the speed limit, but no these AH`s think they own the road. And yes, for towing the Larger Caravans etc, they are great, but not in the town. Just for a run about.
Legally, to tow a caravan you have to have a larger vehicle. The larger the caravan the larger your vehicle / engine power has to be. Most people can't afford to buy and run a small car in addition to a larger one for a caravan etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RobertHarris59
Some people do need those larger vehicles for a range of reasons. I have a gooseneck horsefloat that is towed by a RAM. That same float was towed by its previous owner with a dual-cab ute. That dual-cab ute would have been overloaded and dangerous. That is not the case for the RAM. We also have an Everest. That vehicle is used for trips, a people mover, and the occasional horse tag-type float. We live rural and not close to a major city, and therefore, many of the objections to larger vehicles in the article do not apply. There is plenty of fuel tax created by filling up these bigger vehicles at the bowser - so don't complain.

If you want to complain about heavy vehicles not paying their fair share - have a look at battery electric vehicles. None of the money paid when charging those vehicles goes to a road use tax. Generally, they are heavier than their internal combustion counterparts thanks to the weight of the batteries. Thanks to the 4th power rule identified in an earlier thread, readers should understand that heavier electric vehicles need to pay more in road use tax to compensate for the extra wear on roads. This should be some sort of a vehicle km travel tax to more closely align with liquid fuels consumption tax, which is really a vehicle km tax of sorts.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×