Would removing this cost fix the housing crisis for retirees? Experts weigh in

Housing affordability and accessibility remain pressing issues, with policies like stamp duty playing a significant role in shaping the property market.

While moving to a new home should be a fresh start, for some, the financial barriers make it a difficult choice.

For one homeowner considering a move, the costs associated with stamp duty have turned a potential transition into a financial dilemma.


Lance Williams wanted a change.

His three-bedroom home in Sydney’s west was perfect for a young family, but he was ready for a quieter life under a sky full of stars.

The amateur backyard astronomer dreamed of moving to the NSW south coast, where he and his wife could enjoy their retirement away from the bright city lights.


image1.png
Homeowner’s dream move stalled by costs. Source: e61 Institute


Selling the house would also free up space for another family, just as he had raised his own children there.

But there was one problem—stamp duty.

The financial barrier to downsizing

Mr Williams believed the cost of stamp duty was too high and made it difficult for retirees like him to move.

‘I find it unbelievable that I have to pay the government to put a stamp on a piece of paper, just so they can make $30,000 to $40,000 off this, and then I have to worry about the costs of removals,’ he said.

‘The amount of money that you're going to have to spend, well as a pensioner, that's probably a year, maybe two years' worth of income.’


Even though his home would likely be in demand if put on the market, he hesitated to sell, knowing that much of his potential profit would be lost to fees.

‘Whatever I was going to make out of the house, simply to move, I'm going to lose at least 10 per cent,’ he said.

‘If they really want to free up these homes, then they have to give a stamp duty exemption for retirees.’

How stamp duty affects the market

Nick Garvin, from the economic research institute e61, argued that stamp duty discouraged homeowners from moving.

His research found that stamp duty deterred nearly a quarter of potential downsizers.

A study by his team examined the impact of a one percentage point rise in Queensland’s stamp duty rates, which increased from an average of 1.26 per cent to 2.27 per cent of a property’s purchase price.

It showed that a 1 per cent increase in stamp duty led to a 7.2 per cent drop in home purchases.

Using that data, Dr Garvin estimated that removing NSW’s average 3.5 per cent stamp duty could lead to 100,000 additional property moves—an increase of 25 per cent.

He also pointed out that stamp duty had increased significantly over time.

‘One payment of stamp duty is now around five times what it was about a generation ago,’ he said.


A report from e61 revealed that typical stamp duty payments now cost around five months of take-home income, double what they did in the 2000s.

Dr Garvin argued that abolishing stamp duty—at least for retirees—could benefit the entire market by increasing housing supply in high-demand areas.

‘Often, downsizers are moving from areas in which the housing supply is a bit short, relative to demand,’ he said.

‘So freeing up that housing supply in the high demand area has affordability benefits for everybody else.’

The government’s dilemma

For Mr Williams, stamp duty meant that buying a home on the south coast—where the average price was $572,000—would cost him an extra $21,139.

Some states, like Victoria and the ACT, had introduced stamp duty exemptions for pensioners purchasing properties below certain price thresholds, but NSW had yet to implement similar measures.


However, Dr Garvin acknowledged that removing stamp duty would create financial challenges for state governments.

‘Stamp duty is currently around a quarter of state government revenue … they would seek to get that revenue back elsewhere, maybe through other taxes,’ he said.

Would removing stamp duty make a difference?

Economist and author Dr Cameron Murray was sceptical about whether stamp duty exemptions would have a long-term impact on downsizing.

‘Everyone hates paying tax,’ he said.

‘For a lot of people it would be comical to say, “We don’t want to pay $30,000 to buy a million dollar property”…everyone is going to laugh.’

He argued that while exemptions might trigger a short-term increase in downsizing, they would not have a lasting effect since most people downsized eventually.


Dr Murray also pointed out that pensioners were already exempt from capital gains tax on their primary residence, making homeownership a favourable investment.

Dr Garvin, however, believed that even a one-off spike in downsizing could be significant.

‘If they want to reclaim stamp duty when the people have sold it or have died, well fine—that’s up to them,’ Mr Williams said.

But for now, he remained torn between staying put and dealing with the rising costs of regional property.


In a previous story, we explored how downsizing could impact homeowners financially—but for some, the concerns don’t end there.

Services Australia has warned that selling your home could affect your pension, adding another layer of uncertainty to the decision.

Read more to find out how downsizing might impact your retirement benefits.

Key Takeaways
  • Lance Williams wanted to downsize but found stamp duty costs—up to $40,000—made moving financially unfeasible.
  • Research showed stamp duty deters downsizing, and removing NSW’s 3.5 per cent rate could increase property moves by 25 per cent.
  • Experts debated its impact—some saw benefits for housing affordability, while others argued most homeowners would downsize anyway.
  • Victoria and the ACT offer pensioner exemptions, but NSW has not, as stamp duty makes up a quarter of state revenue.

With stamp duty making downsizing a costly decision, should retirees receive exemptions to free up more housing?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
When Howard bought in the GST states agreed to drop stamp duty, we are being double taxed on most purchases, insurance, homes, car registration etc., the list goes on . Plus overgoverned. Why the need for three tiers of government?
 
When Howard bought in the GST states agreed to drop stamp duty, we are being double taxed on most purchases, insurance, homes, car registration etc., the list goes on . Plus overgoverned. Why the need for three tiers of government?
Yes we are definitely overgoverned and hence overtaxed.
 
Seems to me if Govts are serious about addressing the housing issues, anything that helps is progress.
When Howard bought in the GST states agreed to drop stamp duty, we are being double taxed on most purchases, insurance, homes, car registration etc., the list goes on . Plus overgoverned. Why the need for three tiers of government?
While that may be true, stamp duty is 5% the gst is 10%, I know which tax I would prefer. Which tier of Govt are you suggesting goes my choice would be Councils, one council per major city is sufficient. State Govt is the most necessary imo, and while the Federal could go, I doubt the Commonwealth would agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie and quoll
I don't think removing stamp duty would fix the housing crisis, but it's time some common sense was applied when asking why more retirees don't downsize. First, you have to deal with agent fees to sell your existing home. That's likely to be in the order of $30,000-$50,000, or more, depending on the agent selected and the marketing strategies used. Next, consider stamp duty on your purchase. Another $50K or more. Then count removal costs, possibly interim accommodation and storage fees if you sell before finding a replacement home (in which case you have 2 moves), interest on a bridging loan and loan fees (if you can even find a lender to talk to a retiree!). Then consider that no home you buy (or even build) is going to be perfect for your needs. There will be costs to customise and personalise, fix things that don't work the way you want, etc. New furniture will probably be required, as your existing won't suit the new home - especially if you are moving from a large home to a smaller one. There are other incidental costs that might be incurred. Cleaning and yard tidying costs for either or both the home you are selling and the new one; extra food costs because you get out of routine and have to empty your fridge and freezer; boxes and tape etc. for packing and possibly help to pack and unpack (unless you pay the removalist extra to do it all), insurance for the move, And then there is the impact of any gain on your pension entitlements to consider. All up, you might find that moving to a smaller home worth, say, $200,000 less than your current one actually costs you money rather than freeing up extra cash for living costs. And if you move into a strata unit or retirement village, or to an area closer to city facilities, check carefully what extra fees you will incur for rates, management, access to facilities, etc., because your regular living costs might well increase.
 
When Howard bought in the GST states agreed to drop stamp duty, we are being double taxed on most purchases, insurance, homes, car registration etc., the list goes on . Plus overgoverned. Why the need for three tiers of government?
Get rid of the local leeches, who technically, are not a tier of government.

Their "services" can easily be absorbed by the respective State governments as those "services" don't amount to much except for being revenue generating entities for their own financial gain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie and Tata
I would like to downsize, but cannot afford the stamp duty. If there was no stamp duty I could afford to move from my current country town.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
If it wasn't for the exorbitant stamp duty on sale and re-purchase, I would have downsized years ago. That added to the greedy real estate agent costs make it prohibitive to change.
As for tiers of Government, local & federal are all we need. Get rid of the state leeches as they serve no purpose.
 
I don't think removing stamp duty would fix the housing crisis, but it's time some common sense was applied when asking why more retirees don't downsize. First, you have to deal with agent fees to sell your existing home. That's likely to be in the order of $30,000-$50,000, or more, depending on the agent selected and the marketing strategies used. Next, consider stamp duty on your purchase. Another $50K or more. Then count removal costs, possibly interim accommodation and storage fees if you sell before finding a replacement home (in which case you have 2 moves), interest on a bridging loan and loan fees (if you can even find a lender to talk to a retiree!). Then consider that no home you buy (or even build) is going to be perfect for your needs. There will be costs to customise and personalise, fix things that don't work the way you want, etc. New furniture will probably be required, as your existing won't suit the new home - especially if you are moving from a large home to a smaller one. There are other incidental costs that might be incurred. Cleaning and yard tidying costs for either or both the home you are selling and the new one; extra food costs because you get out of routine and have to empty your fridge and freezer; boxes and tape etc. for packing and possibly help to pack and unpack (unless you pay the removalist extra to do it all), insurance for the move, And then there is the impact of any gain on your pension entitlements to consider. All up, you might find that moving to a smaller home worth, say, $200,000 less than your current one actually costs you money rather than freeing up extra cash for living costs. And if you move into a strata unit or retirement village, or to an area closer to city facilities, check carefully what extra fees you will incur for rates, management, access to facilities, etc., because your regular living costs might well increase.
Retirees have to pay for their overpriced retirements, and saving the house till then to sell it, is one way to do it. Everything seems to cost half a million as deposit, plus ongoing service fees to keep you alive. Most of us got the fraction of a million in retirement pay, but the charges are for those with one million, basic it seems. all for a few years in our old age. Horrible
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×