Is your favourite protein-packed Milo under fire? See how Nestlé tackles the latest uproar!
- Replies 4
Milo, the beloved chocolate malt drink that has been a staple in Australian pantries for generations, recently found itself at the centre of a nutritional controversy. Nestlé, the company behind Milo, has had to step up and address concerns raised by consumers over the protein content in their newer product, Milo Pro. This iteration promises to pack a punch with over 15 grams of protein per glass, aiming to help 'repair your muscles after exercise,' according to the product description. But is it all it's cracked up to be?
The issue that has caused a stir among health-conscious Aussies is not the promise of protein itself but rather the source of it. Some sharp-eyed customers have pointed out that a significant portion of the protein count comes from the recommended serving of skim milk rather than the Milo Pro powder alone. This detail has led to accusations of misleading marketing and has sparked a debate on the integrity of nutritional claims.
The Milo Pro protein predicament began when a disgruntled customer took to social media to voice his dissatisfaction with the product. He described Milo Pro as an 'abomination,' criticizing its taste, texture, and mixability. While some echoed his sentiments about the product's physical attributes, the majority of the backlash focused on the nutritional label. It was revealed that more than half of the advertised 15.5 grams of protein per serving actually comes from the 250ml of skim milk suggested for mixing with the powder. This means that without the milk, consumers are only getting 9.2 grams of protein from the Milo Pro powder itself.
To add to the confusion, regular Milo is typically served with 200ml of skim milk, suggesting that Nestlé may have increased the serving size for Milo Pro to boost the overall protein content. However, Nestlé has defended their decision, stating that the larger serving size was chosen to cater to the audience who consumes protein drinks and prefers more substantial portions.
In response to the backlash, a Nestlé spokesperson explained, 'We know that MILO is a favourite across generations – and we understand protein plays an essential role for many people, including teenagers and active Aussies. Considering this audience, who often drink a larger serving of MILO with milk, we’ve adjusted our serve size accordingly.' They also highlighted that Milo Pro powder contains approximately 50 per cent more protein than Milo Original powder on a per 100g basis, attributing the protein content to a combination of milk powders and cocoa powder.
Despite Nestlé's explanation, fans and critics alike have continued to express their scepticism. Comments on social media range from calling the product 'pointless' to 'scummy,' with some questioning the ethics of the marketing strategy. Many suggest that the protein claim is inflated by the inclusion of milk and argue that it could set a precedent for other products to make similar claims. Some have even offered their own solutions, such as mixing regular Milo with a high-quality unflavored protein powder for a more honest protein boost.
The controversy has also sparked a broader conversation about the importance of protein in our diets. Protein is indeed crucial for muscle repair, growth, and various bodily functions. Australian dietitian Susie Burrell notes that adults should consume at least 0.75g of protein per kilo of body weight per day, which equates to around 60-80g for the average person. Yet, data from the Australian Health Survey indicates that only 14 per cent of Australian adults meet their recommended daily intake of high-quality protein.
As the debate continues, it's clear that transparency in food labelling is a hot topic for consumers. While Nestlé stands by their product, stating that the tin clearly indicates the protein count is 'when served with milk,' the uproar serves as a reminder to always read the fine print and understand where your nutrients are coming from.
So, dear readers, what are your thoughts on this Milo Pro controversy? Have you tried the product, and if so, did it meet your expectations for a protein-rich drink? Or do you feel that the marketing might be a bit too clever for its own good? Share your experiences and opinions with us – after all, it's your health and your right to know what's in your food.
The issue that has caused a stir among health-conscious Aussies is not the promise of protein itself but rather the source of it. Some sharp-eyed customers have pointed out that a significant portion of the protein count comes from the recommended serving of skim milk rather than the Milo Pro powder alone. This detail has led to accusations of misleading marketing and has sparked a debate on the integrity of nutritional claims.
Nestlé criticised for allegedly misleading protein content claims in Milo Pro. Credit: Reddit
The Milo Pro protein predicament began when a disgruntled customer took to social media to voice his dissatisfaction with the product. He described Milo Pro as an 'abomination,' criticizing its taste, texture, and mixability. While some echoed his sentiments about the product's physical attributes, the majority of the backlash focused on the nutritional label. It was revealed that more than half of the advertised 15.5 grams of protein per serving actually comes from the 250ml of skim milk suggested for mixing with the powder. This means that without the milk, consumers are only getting 9.2 grams of protein from the Milo Pro powder itself.
To add to the confusion, regular Milo is typically served with 200ml of skim milk, suggesting that Nestlé may have increased the serving size for Milo Pro to boost the overall protein content. However, Nestlé has defended their decision, stating that the larger serving size was chosen to cater to the audience who consumes protein drinks and prefers more substantial portions.
In response to the backlash, a Nestlé spokesperson explained, 'We know that MILO is a favourite across generations – and we understand protein plays an essential role for many people, including teenagers and active Aussies. Considering this audience, who often drink a larger serving of MILO with milk, we’ve adjusted our serve size accordingly.' They also highlighted that Milo Pro powder contains approximately 50 per cent more protein than Milo Original powder on a per 100g basis, attributing the protein content to a combination of milk powders and cocoa powder.
Despite Nestlé's explanation, fans and critics alike have continued to express their scepticism. Comments on social media range from calling the product 'pointless' to 'scummy,' with some questioning the ethics of the marketing strategy. Many suggest that the protein claim is inflated by the inclusion of milk and argue that it could set a precedent for other products to make similar claims. Some have even offered their own solutions, such as mixing regular Milo with a high-quality unflavored protein powder for a more honest protein boost.
The controversy has also sparked a broader conversation about the importance of protein in our diets. Protein is indeed crucial for muscle repair, growth, and various bodily functions. Australian dietitian Susie Burrell notes that adults should consume at least 0.75g of protein per kilo of body weight per day, which equates to around 60-80g for the average person. Yet, data from the Australian Health Survey indicates that only 14 per cent of Australian adults meet their recommended daily intake of high-quality protein.
As the debate continues, it's clear that transparency in food labelling is a hot topic for consumers. While Nestlé stands by their product, stating that the tin clearly indicates the protein count is 'when served with milk,' the uproar serves as a reminder to always read the fine print and understand where your nutrients are coming from.
.png){kind=icon}
