Australians are open to self-driving vehicles, but want humans to retain ultimate control


file-20240320-28-8o3pjz.jpg

John G. Mabanglo/EPA/AAP



A mob set fire to a Waymo self-driving taxi in San Francisco last month as residents’ anger about the cars boiled over.

Self-driving “robotaxis” run by Waymo and other operators such as Cruise have been causing major concerns in the United States by failing to react properly to certain traffic situations.



So how do Australians feel about automated vehicles? To find out, we surveyed 562 people about their views on self-driving vehicles.

Overall, our findings showed good public support. Nearly half of our respondents saw autonomous vehicles as a desirable trend and travel option for Australians.

However, three-quarters wanted these vehicles to retain the option of being driven by a person. It’s notable, too, how many respondents were undecided – consistently around a third or more – about the issues put to them.



So why the anger in the US?​


Last October, a robotaxi operated in San Francisco by Cruise struck a pedestrian who had been knocked into its path by another vehicle. Instead of making an emergency stop, it dragged her about six metres along the road. Days later, the company said it would suspend all operations to examine its process and earn back public trust.


GM’s Cruise has recalled all of its 950 robotaxis.




Waymo has also had some safety slips. Two Waymo cars crashed into the same pickup truck while it was being towed in Phoenix, Arizona, last December.

Tesla Autopilot has not been immune to repeated errors either. Last December, Tesla recalled more than 2 million vehicles to fix an Autopilot flaw. The recall followed an investigation by US regulators.



In a further blow to the industry, Apple is reported to have cancelled its secretive “Titan” project to build a self-driving electric car. Billions of dollars were reportedly sunk into the decade-long project.





Public acceptance of vehicles depends on trust​


The industry now recognises that creating self-driving vehicles is a much harder technical challenge than previously thought. As recent incidents show, public acceptance and trust are also going to be crucial for their success.

In our representative survey of 562 respondents from Melbourne, the overall results showed good public support.



Around 47% of respondents had a positive view of these vehicles as a desirable trend and travel option for Australians. Only 18% disagreed, though 35% were undecided. Another 47% said vehicle automation would reduce their driving workload.


Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.07.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper





Sentiment about the benefits of these vehicles was also positive. A majority (51%) believed automated vehicles will provide them with more time to complete other tasks while travelling.

There was also good support for the potential of these vehicles to improve safety and reduce vehicle emissions if they are electrified.




Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.18.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper



People do not want to surrender all control​


Highly automated vehicles do not require any human intervention. Overall, however, respondents did not favour this level of vehicle autonomy.



A large majority (74%) felt these vehicles must have the option of being driven by a person. Giving complete driving responsibility to a computer would make 62% of respondents feel stressed. Around 70% said they would like to control where and when to use the automated functions, and which functions to use.

Around 72% believed automated vehicles must be made identifiable by, for example, a specific label, licence plate or sign.



More than half (55%) thought it was unsafe for children to travel without an adult in a self-driving car.

These findings suggest most people are hesitant about entrusting all driving tasks to automation.




Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.25.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper



What other concerns do people have?​


Around 80% of respondents were concerned about legal and financial liability in the event of a malfunction or crash. They had similar concerns about technology and system failures.



Respondents also raised concerns about how automated vehicles perform in bad weather conditions. Other issues included cyber security and data privacy.


Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.32.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper





Respondents emphasised concerns about the safety of automated vehicles in mixed traffic. Almost a third were strongly concerned about riding in a self-driving vehicle next to other automated vehicles.

Respondents also had concerns about how these vehicles will interact with other road users. Around 47% were strongly concerned about the safety of self-driving trucks in mixed traffic.



Respondents were more confident about the safety of automated public transport buses.


Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.43.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper





Ranking the barriers to public acceptance​


We asked respondents to rank the barriers to public acceptance on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 is most significant and 7 least significant).

The most prominent concern (46% of respondents ranked it first) was technical reliability or trust in the technology. It ranked as the number-one barrier to public acceptance.



The high price tag of automated vehicles ranked second (31% of respondents). Legal issues (25%) ranked third. Then, in order, came concerns about cyber security, potential erosion of privacy, and technology maturity. Respondents ranked lack of regulations as their least concern – 38% put it in seventh position.


Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.30.55.png
Respondent ranking of barriers, where 1 is most significant barrier and 7 is least significant barrier
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehicles. Created with Datawrapper





Around 40% of respondents showed a strong willingness to buy an automated vehicle. Their main reasons were to reduce their carbon footprint and for safety.

Almost 47% said competitive purchase costs and lower insurance premiums would increase incentives to buy an automated vehicle. Premiums could fall because some studies expect these vehicles to be safer than human drivers.




Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 14.31.11.png
Chart: Swinburne University of Technology (2024). Survey of public perception of connected and automated vehiclesCreated with Datawrapper



What’s next?​

These findings enrich the debate on automated vehicle adoption in Australia by offering an understanding of public sentiment. The factors that sway public willingness to embrace these vehicles must be acknowledged. Policymakers, manufacturers and other stakeholders can then focus on resolving the concerns and responding to public desires.



Strategies such as live demonstrations and dedicated travel lanes and routes can help build trust. Financial incentives and policy to resolve legal liabilities are also likely to help foster the uptake of automated vehicles.

While fully autonomous vehicles remain elusive, many automated vehicle technologies available today can still be built into our cars to help improve safety, reduce driving load and emissions, and improve air quality.



Automated vehicles can play an important role in a sustainable transport future. But unless public concerns and barriers are addressed, travellers will remain sceptical of vehicle automation, and adoption of these vehicles will stall.

This article was first published on The Conversation, and was written by , Hussein Dia, Professor of Future Urban Mobility, Swinburne University of Technology, Ali Matin, Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Abby2
Sponsored
I really dislike some of these autonomous functions. My 2022 car has auto lane keep, so if I pull wide to avoid a cyclist and go too near the white line in the middle of the road, my car tries to veer back to middle of the lane risking hitting the cyclist. I now turn that function off as soon as I've started the car.
 
The sooner we have fully autonomous cars the better we will be - no exemptions to this.
Just what makes people think they are smarter than machines ???
After working 50 years in the manufacturing of electronic components I think putting your life under control of electronic sensors/computers that are prone to failure from vibrations is just stupid. Full AI would cost millions of dollars per vehicle, that isn't going to happen.
 
The sooner we have fully autonomous cars the better we will be - no exemptions to this.
Just what makes people think they are smarter than machines ???
What makes me think I am smarter than machines?

Over 30 years of software design and testing experience.

People design the programs, people encode them and people integrate them into the vehicles. Those people make mistakes.

A machine cannot recognise those mistakes and take action to work around them... they are 'High Speed Idiots' that will repetitively obey incorrect instructions thousands of times every second.

People, on the other hand, can recognise the mistakes (sometimes) and ignore or override the mistakes to keep themselves and others safe.
 
I really dislike some of these autonomous functions. My 2022 car has auto lane keep, so if I pull wide to avoid a cyclist and go too near the white line in the middle of the road, my car tries to veer back to middle of the lane risking hitting the cyclist. I now turn that function off as soon as I've started the car.
Our car just beeps and gives a gentle nudge, if we ignore it, it doesn't try to push us back. Some cars are worse than others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and Catherines
I won’t be buying, using or travelling in one of these self-driving vehicles at any time soon, or ever.

How will insurance companies decide the ‘car is at fault’ (not the driver using its technology) when something happens and so will charge the manufacturer for the full life of its vehicle? How many insurance companies haven’t tried to find a niggling little excuse to avoid a customer’s claim at some stage, be it house or car insurance?

I had some rain damage to our ceiling in February 2022. It took one call to report it in early March 2022 when mould was discovered. Insurance asked us to pay our $600 excess on the spot, which we did, and I made a number of follow up calls; getting fed up, I then put everything in writing telling them the mould would affect our health if not attended to, but it took another 6 months for an assessor to come out and inspect the area and agree to fixing the issue.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: pymmie and DLHM
Tesla are having a major problem with their self-driving cars. They rely on cameras, but these cameras have trouble seeing anything that's white. So quite a few Teslas have pulled out in front of white-sided trucks at intersections, with the cars going under the trucks, ripping the roof off & decapitating the drivers. Other Tesla drivers are having to take evasive action to avoid the car hitting other vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, poles etc. They also can't stay in their own lane, especially if there are roadworks where the lane markings are a bit ambiguous. I don't want to drive around with these cars on the road!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
No way I will ever get in an automated vehicle, especially if it is an EV. It is not worth the risk to my safety or the safety of other road users.
If you are too lazy to drive yourself, catch a train, bus or taxi.
"In Australia, there have been limited trials of autonomous vehicles since 2015, with Adelaide looking into their use as public transport. However, robotic private cars are unlikely to be a common feature on city streets anytime soon." - Drive.com.au
 
  • Like
Reactions: SandyM
Not for me. There’s enough trouble with the cars of today that we can control, recalls because of faults by manufacturers, cars bursting into flames. Who will get the blame when one of these self- automated cars injures or worse, kills someone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SandyM

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×