New Design
  1. Enable New Design

You have only hours left to weigh in on this proposed change across rural Australia. What's about to happen?

News & Politics

You have only hours left to weigh in on this proposed change across rural Australia. What's about to happen?

pexels-pat-whelen-2913248-8663253.jpg You have only hours left to weigh in on this proposed change across rural Australia. What's about to happen?
Many Australians take rural roads when travelling across the country. Disclaimer: This image is not an accurate representation of the article's content. Image Credit: Pexels/Pat Wheelen

Time's up for having your say on a controversial proposal that could see some changes across rural Aussie roads.



What is this looming change, and can you still share your thoughts about it in public?




The Federal Government's consultation period closed at 5:00 PM last Monday, 27 October, ending the opportunity for public input on proposed changes.



The proposed changes could change default speed limits on unsigned rural roads from 100km/h down to 80km/h on sealed roads.



Lower limits may apply for unsealed roads.



The timing couldn't be more significant for anyone who regularly travels Australia's vast network of country roads.



The proposal that's got rural Australia talking

The changes form part of the National Road Safety Action Plan 2023-25, with consultation papers suggesting speed limits could be reduced to 80km/h on sealed roads and 70km/h on unsealed roads where no speed limit signs are posted.



To put this in context, Australia has nearly 860,000 kilometres of unsealed roads—including dirt and gravel tracks—outside built-up areas.



That's an enormous network that many of us rely on for everything from visiting the grandchildren to accessing essential services.


The sobering statistics behind the push

The government's motivation comes from some genuinely concerning road safety data that affects us all.




According to the Department of Infrastructure, the risk of being killed on a regional or remote road is 11 times higher than in a major city.



Even more alarming, in 2024 alone, 1,294 people were killed and more than 30,000 seriously injured on Australian roads, with speed identified as a leading factor.




'Travelling at up to 100 kilometres per hour on some unsealed or narrow regional roads can increase the risk of serious crashes.'

- Department of Infrastructure consultation paper



These aren't just numbers—they represent real families affected by preventable tragedies, many of whom are in our age group with decades of driving experience.


Rural communities fight back

Despite the safety concerns, the proposal has met fierce resistance from regional Australia.



Member for Northern Tablelands Brendan Moylan has called the proposal 'a cop out and a lazy excuse for not properly investing in the maintenance and safety improvements of regional roads'.



The sentiment echoes across rural communities, where residents feel the solution lies in better roads, not slower speeds.



'We need safer roads to travel on, ones that aren't crumbling under our wheels and that have the same safety infrastructure as roads in the metro areas,' Moylan stated.




What rural residents are saying


Many regional Australians argue that reduced speed limits will increase travel times without addressing the real problem. They point out that longer journey times could actually increase fatigue-related accidents, especially for older drivers managing medical appointments or family visits that are already lengthy trips.





The frustration is palpable online. One resident noted, 'As someone who lives and works in rural Australia, this proposal feels like another decision made without truly understanding regional life'



Cutting country road speed limits isn't the solution—it's a temporary fix that punishes rural communities instead of addressing the real issue: neglected roads.



We rely on these routes for work, family, and business, and slower limits will only make us more isolated. Invest in safer, better roads—don't just slow us down,'the resident concluded in an online post.




What happens next?

Now that consultation has closed, a review committee will soon recommend whether to proceed with lowering the currently mandated 100km/h default speed limit.



If approved, the process for changing Australian road rules, including drafting, consultation and approval, typically takes about 18 months.



If adopted, the changes would form part of the Australian Road Rules, providing a national framework for states and territories to align their speed regulations. However, states and territories would still be able to adjust the thresholds, meaning variations could be seen across the country.



What this means for senior drivers

For those of us who've been driving for decades, these potential changes represent more than just numbers on a speed sign.



The practical reality is that lower speed limits could add significant time to journeys that are already challenging for older drivers, who must manage fatigue and comfort needs.



While the consultation period has ended, there are still ways to stay engaged with this critical issue.



Keep track of developments: The review committee's recommendations are expected to be announced in the coming months. State motoring organisations and regional newspapers will likely provide updates.



Contact your representatives: Local members of parliament, particularly those representing rural constituencies, will continue to advocate on this issue.



Plan accordingly: If changes are approved, allow extra time for rural journeys and consider the timing of longer trips to account for increased travel duration.



The debate over rural road speed limits reflects a broader challenge facing regional Australia—balancing safety with the practical realities of rural life. Whether you support the safety-first approach or believe better roads are the answer, any changes will significantly impact how we navigate Australia's vast regional landscapes.



Have you encountered situations where current speed limits felt unsafe, or do you believe the focus should be on road improvements instead? Share your thoughts and experiences with fellow members—your insights could help inform the ongoing conversation about keeping our regional roads safe for everyone.





  • Primary source






  • Default rural speed limit could drop to 80km/h under new road safety proposal | New England Times

    Cited text: 'Public consultation on the proposed change is open until 27 October, with feedback invited at infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say.'


    Excerpt: 'The Federal Government's consultation period closed at 5:00 PM yesterday (October 27).'







  • Just days left to have your say on country road speed limits—Beef Central

    Cited text: 'A consultation paper released in conjunction with the review suggests speed limits could be reduced to 80km/h on sealed roads and 70km/h on unsealed roads...'


    Excerpt: 'Consultation papers suggesting speed limits could be reduced to 80km/h on sealed roads and 70km/h on unsealed roads'





  • Like
Reactions: Kinchar

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I AM also going to say if there were enough police it may also be designed to build speeding fines revenue... for the pollies to pay some of the debts accrued in every state - especially victoria
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: Gus and gbaerken
A total cop-out by the federal government, which only remembers that voters exist outside the major cities when an election is about to happen.
Leave the speed limits alone. FIX THE ROADS INSTEAD!
 
fix the effing roads. Can those stupid (outdated) subs and fix the effing roads!
 
Been happening for years.
4& 5 lame freeways in and out on Melbourne have been 80kmh for years. About 10kms heading in from the South East and at least 15-20 kms heading out to the airport and all our tunnels are 80 kmh reduced to 60 in peak hour. “They” say the slower speed make the traffic flow better. What utter bullshit!
 
Of course it will save lives. if you oppose this, please nominate the people you want o see killed on the roads.
 
Of course it will save lives. if you oppose this, please nominate the people you want o see killed on the roads.
My list is too long....
 
A total cop-out by the federal government, which only remembers that voters exist outside the major cities when an election is about to happen.
Leave the speed limits alone. FIX THE ROADS INSTEAD!
If you want better roads, we need to return to our pre-1990s arrangements where roads were build by world class engineers employed by the government. These days they are built by the cheapest tenderer, and break up in six moths!
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
I AM also going to say if there were enough police it may also be designed to build speeding fines revenue... for the pollies to pay some of the debts accrued in every state - especially victoria
Change your news sources.
 
fix the effing roads. Can those stupid (outdated) subs and fix the effing roads!
If you want better roads, we need to return to our pre-1990s arrangements where roads were build by world class engineers and specialists employed by the government. These days they are built by the cheapest tenderer, and break up in six months!
 
Last edited:
I am more in favour of selecting a speed limit appropriate to the particular road condition and maintaining a higher speed on good quality roads.
In my own experience, I find that my senses and attention are sharper at a higher speed on good quality roads. Moseying along at 80 kph on a good quality road is quite soporific on a long drive with a tendancy to lose concentration and possibly nod off and drift off the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
Reducing the speed limits on sealed rural roads will only increase drive times leading to increased driver fatigue in many cases, which is a more dangerous scenario. An increase in visible policing and proper maintenance of the road surfaces would be better solutions in most cases. Certainly unsealed roads should have lower maximum speeds as most travellers are not used to driving on these surfaces.
 
Unsealed roads at higher speeds also have an increased risk of skidding, and require greater stopping distances, therefore greater separation between vehicles. Also, rutting/corrugation of the road increases by vehicles travelling faster thereby increasing the skid hazard and the cost of maintenance.
 
Fix the roads PROPERLY not the quick fix that takes months to finish and then needs redoing 10 minutes later and costs millions to do, get the trains up and running again to get the huge trucks off the roads. 80km is a ridiculous idea for country roads, a long journey would be even longer making fatigue a huge factor.
 
Been happening for years.
4& 5 lame freeways in and out on Melbourne have been 80kmh for years. About 10kms heading in from the South East and at least 15-20 kms heading out to the airport and all our tunnels are 80 kmh reduced to 60 in peak hour. “They” say the slower speed make the traffic flow better. What utter bullshit!
But Eastlink and the Monash Freeway are 100 to 110 kmh speed limited.

There aren't any other south eastern expressways that I recall.
 
Just make every road in Australia 30 kmh speed limited.

That should please the "experts".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: relljube
What is the point of introducing this ridiculous rule if the states have the prerogative to amend it to their preferred speed? What a bloody waste of money again by this inept government who wouldn't know if their asses were on fire.
 
But Eastlink and the Monash Freeway are 100 to 110 kmh speed limited.

There aren't any other south eastern expressways that I recall.
Please show which parts of Eastlink and the Monash are 110 kmh.
i have driven on both daily for years and there is not one part of either that is 110 kmh
 
Of course it will save lives. if you oppose this, please nominate the people you want o see killed on the roads.
Do with that ridiculous comment why don't we reduce the speed to 10kmh.
Then no-one will die.
 
Fix the rural roads, which hasn't had any updates or modifications for twenty odd years or more, most rural roads have turned into goat tracks, not fit to drive on, this is why there is accidents on rural roads because we are dodging pot holes, this includes some highways as well, it is a fu... disgrace, we who live in the country should not be paying regristration's fees, because we have expenses every day by replacing tyres, front ends due to the conditions of country roads and some highway's. So NO to lowering speed limits, FIX THE F.... COUNTRY ROADS AND HIGHWAYS, so we can all be safe...?
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×