New Design
  1. Enable New Design

Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain hits the big screen—why everyone will be talking about it this Australia Day

TV & Movies

Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain hits the big screen—why everyone will be talking about it this Australia Day

  • Maan
  • By Maan
1761791572594.png Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain hits the big screen—why everyone will be talking about it this Australia Day
Politics, popcorn, and Pauline—coming this Australia Day. Image source: Please Explain

What began as a small-scale political experiment has grown into one of Australia’s most talked-about cultural flashpoints.


Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain animated series has divided audiences, sparked legal drama, and ignited fiery national debates.


Now, it’s making the leap from social media screens to the big screen—with a feature film debut set for Australia Day.




The timing is no accident.


In fact, it’s a calculated move that reflects the series’ unapologetic approach to poking the bear of Australian identity and politics.


From YouTube roots to Hollywood lights, this is the unlikely journey of a cartoon classroom that became a cultural juggernaut.



The series follows Hanson—voiced by herself—as a teacher lecturing a class of politicians, turning current events into lessons that double as political commentary for the One Nation party.


What started as a modest investment has snowballed into one of the party’s biggest publicity machines.


Some episodes have surpassed the views on Hanson’s previous most popular uploads, including her maiden speech, with one episode clocking more than 260,000 views.


The party’s YouTube channel experienced a 338 per cent surge in subscribers during campaign periods, reaching 50,000 followers.


Its animation style channels the irreverence of South Park, featuring caricatures like Barnaby Joyce with a beetroot head and Scott Morrison strolling in late wearing a Hawaiian shirt and lei.


But beneath the absurdist humour lies a finely tuned political strategy aimed at shaping public perception through laughter.




'It started small, as a lot of these things do, and now we have half a million people tuning into the show per week.'

One Nation spokesman, news.com.au




The series’ rise has been far from smooth.


One episode drew formal complaints from the Australian Electoral Commission after falsely depicting Labor MPs plotting to boost their votes using fake postal ballots.


The platforms later removed the episode following the complaint, fuelling further debate about censorship and political misinformation online.


More recently, Hanson faced legal threats from Robert Irwin’s lawyers over an episode criticising Queensland’s Labor government, which also featured Irwin and cartoon favourite Bluey in unflattering portrayals.


Hanson refused to back down, declaring: 'I can confidently say we won't be taking the episode down... This episode highlighted the struggles many Queenslanders are facing due to serious failures of the Miles Labor state government.'



For many Australians over 60, this latest controversy has a familiar ring to it.


From Max Gillies’ political impersonations to The Chaser’s biting stunts, satire has long been part of the national political DNA.


Ironically, Hanson herself once fought against it, securing an injunction to block ABC from airing a satirical song by comedian Simon Hunt’s alter ego, ‘Pauline Pantsdown’, in the late 1990s.


Now, she finds herself at the centre of the very genre she once tried to silence.


Dr Stephen Mill from the University of Sydney warned that such portrayals might ‘further undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of mainstream legislative politics’—a concern that resonates amid record-low trust in government.




Despite its high profile, Please Explain runs on a surprisingly lean budget.


Each episode costs roughly $11,000 to produce, funded through party resources and crowdfunding efforts.


Supporters have chipped in through donations and purchases from One Nation’s online store, including branded gin, rum, and vodka.


The series is produced by Melbourne’s Stepmates Studios, best known for the Seven Network cartoon Regular Old Bogan.


The partnership has proved mutually beneficial—Stepmates gained national attention, while One Nation gained sleek, professionally produced propaganda wrapped in humour.



Choosing Australia Day for the film’s release was no coincidence.


For Hanson, the date represents ‘the most important day of the year’, though it remains deeply painful for many First Nations communities who see it as the beginning of colonisation.


It’s a move that perfectly encapsulates the series’ ethos—using entertainment and controversy to amplify political messages that might otherwise go unheard.


Whether that’s clever marketing or calculated provocation depends entirely on where you stand politically.




While Hanson has expressed hope for a streaming giant to pick up the adaptation, none have publicly shown interest.


For now, distribution remains limited to One Nation’s YouTube channel and occasional segments on Sky News Australia.


A University of New South Wales report labelled the series ‘far-right’, a description Hanson rejected, underscoring the polarised debate surrounding its content.


Ultimately, the film’s success will hinge on whether viewers can separate humour from ideology—a distinction growing harder to maintain in today’s fractured media landscape.


Whether you see Please Explain as bold political innovation or manipulative propaganda, one thing is clear—it has changed how Australian politics is packaged and consumed.


Come Australia Day, the cartoon classroom steps into the cinema spotlight…and the nation will once again be forced to decide where it stands.





What This Means For You


What started as a small online project has evolved into a full-blown media phenomenon, with Please Explain now attracting hundreds of thousands of viewers each episode.


Along the way, it’s faced its share of controversy—from Electoral Commission complaints to legal threats from Robert Irwin’s lawyers—yet it continues to thrive.


Each episode reportedly costs around $11,000 to produce, funded through party resources and crowdfunding, showing just how invested supporters have become.


And with its Australia Day film release timed to stir debate, it’s clear Pauline Hanson’s team knows how to keep Australians talking.


Whether you find it entertaining or infuriating, there’s no denying that Please Explain taps into the same mix of humour, politics, and national pride that’s long defined the Aussie spirit.




While political satire like Please Explain shines a light on how humour shapes public opinion, real-world policy changes can have an even greater impact on daily life.


As leaders debate culture and identity on screen, others are making decisions that affect health, care, and financial wellbeing off it.


If you’re curious about how recent government changes could influence these areas, the next story offers a closer look.


Read more: New Minister for Ageing: What It Means for Older Australians’ Health, Care and Finances





Do you think satire like Please Explain helps political discussion—or just makes it harder to take politics seriously?

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I cannot wait to watch the cartoon, it will be so funny and will realy promote her depth of intellect!!
 
How many of us are exclusively left or right?
Does it really matter? I’m looking forward to watching “Please Explain”.
I'm ambidextrous....
 
Ladies and gentlemen there’s a granny Biffo 🥊 🥊
In aisle 8 come one come all. 🥊
🤣🤣🤣omg this is hilarious 😂 I often wondered what my two favourite people NOT would be like together
 
Im actually a Pauline Hanson fan, shock, horror. But she gets the Australian people.

Why keep bringing migrants in when we dont have enough housing for the people already here.

She may come across racist but she's not she just says it as it is.

Im not racist, I have many friends of different nationalities .

I believe the problem is when migrants come into this country and take over areas and turn it into a mini country of where they came from.
A perfect example is suburbs in Sydney, Lakemba ,Punchbowl, Bankstown the list goes on.

I believe when migrants come into our country they need to adapt to our ways. Im not saying for them to forget their religion or food ect only they need to adapt to our way of life.

I also believe they need to learn English and should have already started learning before becoming a citizen.

If we go to another country especially a Moslem country we need to abide by their rules and ways .

I can't wait to see Pauline's cartoon.
 
🤣🤣🤣omg this is hilarious 😂 I often wondered what my two favourite people NOT would be like together
Don’t think too hard Suzanne…self-awareness can be quite a shock the first time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54
Don’t think too hard Suzanne…self-awareness can be quite a shock the first time.
Oh its been awhile since you have been on here. We have missed your positive , no I mean your laughable comments.
 
Pauline Hanson has quite a few crazy person ideas.

I want to provide two examples why she is naïve.

The Bradfield Scheme

Malcolm Roberts claimed he solved the Bradfield Schemes issues. He has calculated fixes for where Bradfield made mistakes, and expected water to run up hill.

But he did not appear to solve the issue of evaporation (from memory)

However, 100% of water goes in at the top of Queensland at least 33% is lost to evaporation and possibly 10% to seepage.

This is crazy idea is expensive and inefficient.

_______

The other issue that concerns me is people banging on about reviving manufacturing.

Pauline Hanson keeps banging on about reviving Australian manufacturing.

However, there are three key questions.

1. Manufacture what, exactly?

2. Who is going to buy the product?

3. How sustainable is the demand?

There are basically two types of customer base – domestic – international.

The domestic customer base must be able to support the business when it competes in the international marketplace.

If the domestic marketplace cannot support the Australian manufacturing business, then, larger international competitors discount their similar product until the Australian business collapses.

______

Now, everybody look around your house at your appliances – fridge, TV, microwave, electric jug, iron etc.

How old are they?

Is your house already cluttered with gadgets and whatnot that you already do not use on a regular basis?

What other appliances would you put into your house?

_____

The last issue is the world population is not 8.3 billion. There are more adults than there has ever been on earth. Most of those adults need regular jobs to support themselves and family.

What appears to be happening in the world is ‘traditional trade’ is breaking down.

For example. Australia manufactured electric jugs. New Zealand manufactured electric toasters.

Cross trade worked. Australia bought NZ made toasters, NZ bought Australian made jugs.

____

Now, as the populations have increased, each government has extra pressure to create jobs.

Australia decides to start manufacturing toasters. NZ starts manufacturing jugs.

We know longer have that cross trade.
_____

As every modern nation becomes more populous, and the demand for jobs increases, these countries are going to create more jobs by manufacturing products they once purchased off other countries.

Traditional trade is going to end up collapsing. Most countries with smaller populations are going to experience it worse, because their population is not enough to sustain most manufacturing.
_____

Hanson is kidding herself.

There is a magic number for say electrical goods in Australia. That number is about 16.5 million units.

Imagine 4 companies manufacturing a combined 120,000 units a week – the domestic market ‘off scratch’ is saturated within 4 years – working 40 weeks a year.

The second issue is the gap between new for old replacement.

Ideally, those 4 companies want their products to wear out in 4 years to sustain their businesses. However, when their products last 10 years, they have a major problem with sustainability.

That is why we cannot manufacture a lot of things in Australia… aside from copyrights patents, rights etc.

Hanson talks it up, but she cannot beat the numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54
Pauline Hanson has quite a few crazy person ideas.

I want to provide two examples why she is naïve.

The Bradfield Scheme

Malcolm Roberts claimed he solved the Bradfield Schemes issues. He has calculated fixes for where Bradfield made mistakes, and expected water to run up hill.

But he did not appear to solve the issue of evaporation (from memory)

However, 100% of water goes in at the top of Queensland at least 33% is lost to evaporation and possibly 10% to seepage.

This is crazy idea is expensive and inefficient.

_______

The other issue that concerns me is people banging on about reviving manufacturing.

Pauline Hanson keeps banging on about reviving Australian manufacturing.

However, there are three key questions.

1. Manufacture what, exactly?

2. Who is going to buy the product?

3. How sustainable is the demand?

There are basically two types of customer base – domestic – international.

The domestic customer base must be able to support the business when it competes in the international marketplace.

If the domestic marketplace cannot support the Australian manufacturing business, then, larger international competitors discount their similar product until the Australian business collapses.

______

Now, everybody look around your house at your appliances – fridge, TV, microwave, electric jug, iron etc.

How old are they?

Is your house already cluttered with gadgets and whatnot that you already do not use on a regular basis?

What other appliances would you put into your house?

_____

The last issue is the world population is not 8.3 billion. There are more adults than there has ever been on earth. Most of those adults need regular jobs to support themselves and family.

What appears to be happening in the world is ‘traditional trade’ is breaking down.

For example. Australia manufactured electric jugs. New Zealand manufactured electric toasters.

Cross trade worked. Australia bought NZ made toasters, NZ bought Australian made jugs.

____

Now, as the populations have increased, each government has extra pressure to create jobs.

Australia decides to start manufacturing toasters. NZ starts manufacturing jugs.

We know longer have that cross trade.
_____

As every modern nation becomes more populous, and the demand for jobs increases, these countries are going to create more jobs by manufacturing products they once purchased off other countries.

Traditional trade is going to end up collapsing. Most countries with smaller populations are going to experience it worse, because their population is not enough to sustain most manufacturing.
_____

Hanson is kidding herself.

There is a magic number for say electrical goods in Australia. That number is about 16.5 million units.

Imagine 4 companies manufacturing a combined 120,000 units a week – the domestic market ‘off scratch’ is saturated within 4 years – working 40 weeks a year.

The second issue is the gap between new for old replacement.

Ideally, those 4 companies want their products to wear out in 4 years to sustain their businesses. However, when their products last 10 years, they have a major problem with sustainability.

That is why we cannot manufacture a lot of things in Australia… aside from copyrights patents, rights etc.

Hanson talks it up, but she cannot beat the numbers.
Hanson keeps talking, has no idea regarding the implications for her views, has no policies, swings whatever way she thinks she`ll gain votes and the worst part about this is, that people are following her !! What does this mean should she gather further traction.
It`s a lot like Trump he has no real idea or care regarding the place he is taking the world, makes every post a winner regarding his back pocket and many world leaders and Americans are eating out of his hand.???
 
No a fan of Pauline Hanson, never have been, never will be, so will not be watching this. Have better things to watch in my relaxation time.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×