New Design
  1. Enable New Design

Should Acknowledgements of Country recognise migrants too? This businessman says yes

News & Politics

Should Acknowledgements of Country recognise migrants too? This businessman says yes

1761539877523.png Should Acknowledgements of Country recognise migrants too? This businessman says yes
Migrants added to Acknowledgement of Country debate. Image source: Pexels/Hugo Heimendinger | Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.

The familiar words echo through community halls, sports events and official gatherings across Australia: 'We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which we meet today.'


But what if these ceremonies also recognised another group that helped shape modern Australia?


One Brisbane businessman believes it’s time for a change—and he’s quietly leading the way.




Phil Di Bella, the coffee entrepreneur whose family migrated from Sicily over 60 years ago, has been modifying his Acknowledgement of Country statements to include migrants.


'My acknowledgment is to both; it starts with the traditional custodians then flows to the migrants who came here to make Australia what it is and what it will be,' Di Bella told the Courier Mail.


The 52-year-old adds that 'politicians are starting to copy me.'


Acknowledgement of Country recognises that you are meeting on the land of First Nations peoples and provides an opportunity for everyone there to show respect for Traditional Owners and their ongoing connection to Country.


Unlike a Welcome to Country, which should be presented by Traditional Owners, an Acknowledgement of Country can be offered by any person.


The contemporary practice began around the time of the historic Mabo decision in 1992.


In 2010, Federal Parliament decided to open each session with an Acknowledgement of the Ngunnawal Clan-Nation, making it official protocol to begin Parliament with the Lord's Prayer and an Acknowledgement of Country.


Acknowledgements can be adapted and expanded to reflect different contexts.


For example, an author might acknowledge that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are the land’s first storytellers, or a scientific meeting might recognise the sophistication of First Nations knowledges.




Di Bella’s perspective comes from lived experience.


As a son of migrants whose parents arrived in Australia over 60 years ago, he embodies the Australian migrant success story.


His father often joked that four people arrived on a boat with only two suitcases.


His parents 'did it tough' after arriving from Italy with two young children and little more than a suitcase.


His father worked as a groundsman at the Royal Brisbane Hospital while his mother was a seamstress at Breakfast Creek.


Di Bella became the first in his family to attend university, studying commerce at Griffith University as 'an honour' to his parents, though he 'always had a burning desire to be in control of my own destiny.'


That drive led him to create Di Bella Coffee at age 26 in 2002, which grew into one of Australia’s largest specialty coffee roasters.


He sold the business to Retail Food Group for $47 million in 2014.


He was the world’s youngest recipient of an Italian knighthood, receiving the 'Order of the Star of Italian Solidarity' for his contribution to the Italian community.




Not everyone agrees with expanding these ceremonies.


Northern Territory Aboriginal woman Cheron Long, known for her commentary on Indigenous issues, argues the ceremonies should be replaced entirely with recognition of Australian veterans.



'I've had a gutful of this fake, token Welcome to Country crap. Every damn footy game, cricket match, concert, you name it. We've got to sit through this same rehearsed nonsense like it actually means anything to the average Aussie.'

Cheron Long


Long suggests a different approach: 'How about we honour the people who actually built and protected this country: our Anzacs, our veterans, the men and women who gave their lives so that we can enjoy a beer and watch a game and live free.'


'It's not culture, it's a box-ticking exercise pushed down our throats' - Cheron Long


The debate raises questions about what is permissible under established protocols.


Incorporating welcoming and acknowledgement protocols recognises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners of land and shows respect.


Protocols explicitly state that Acknowledgement of Country 'can be adapted and expanded for different contexts.'


The type of acknowledgement undertaken should be appropriate to the nature and size of the event or material.


This flexibility suggests there may be room for the adaptation Di Bella proposes, though it would require careful consideration of cultural sensitivities and consultation with local Indigenous communities.


Acknowledgement of Country is usually given at the beginning of meetings, speeches or other formal occasions by the Chair or Master of Ceremonies.




For many Australians over 60, these ceremonies have become a regular part of community life—from RSL meetings to local council gatherings, from sporting events to cultural performances.


The debate reflects broader questions about Australian identity and how various groups’ contributions are recognised.


It is particularly relevant for a generation that witnessed significant waves of post-war migration alongside gradual recognition of Indigenous rights.


The history of dispossession and colonisation lies at the heart of the disparity between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians today.


Including recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in events, meetings and national symbols contributes to ending exclusion that has been so damaging.


Any changes to established protocols would need to balance respect for Indigenous culture with acknowledgement of Australia’s multicultural heritage.


The ceremonies were incorporated 'to enable the wider community to share in Aboriginal culture and heritage, facilitating better relationships between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians.'




Di Bella’s conversation highlights genuine desires within parts of the community to be more inclusive while underlining the delicate nature of cultural protocols.


As these discussions continue in community halls and political offices across the country, they remind us that questions of recognition, respect and national identity remain very much alive.


Whether Di Bella’s approach gains broader acceptance will likely depend on how well it balances acknowledgement of Indigenous primacy with recognition of Australia’s multicultural journey.



What This Means For You


Acknowledgement of Country can be given by anyone, while a Welcome to Country is exclusive to Traditional Owners. These acknowledgements are flexible and can be adapted to different contexts, allowing for recognition of both Indigenous peoples and migrants who have contributed to Australia’s story.


Phil Di Bella’s proposal to include migrants highlights the important role they have played in shaping modern Australia and has already attracted attention among some politicians. Any changes to these protocols, however, require careful consultation with Indigenous communities to ensure cultural respect is maintained.


For Australian audiences, this conversation is relevant because it encourages reflection on how we honour all groups that have helped build the nation while respecting the primacy of Traditional Owners. It invites communities to think about inclusivity, cultural recognition, and the balance between tradition and contemporary values.




The conversation around Acknowledgement of Country and inclusion of migrants has sparked a variety of opinions across the country.


If you want to see how people are reacting to these ceremonies in real-life events, there’s a story that captures the differing viewpoints.


It’s a useful follow-up to explore how public sentiment can vary and what debates are unfolding around these cultural practices.



Read more: Too much of a good thing? Aussies split on Welcome to Country ceremonies





What are your thoughts on adapting traditional ceremonies—should acknowledgements evolve to reflect Australia’s multicultural story?

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
From their own elders many years ago, they never owned the land, they were its caretakers. First Nations is an Americanism that has no meaning in Australia and shouldn't be used.
Very interesting about the inclusion of immigrantsthough.
 
We are one but we are many.

We should be recognised as one not individuals.

The same as one flag should be flown . I hate when I drive through certain suburbs that have a high population of a certain nationality only to see flags of that country flying everywhere. Oh yeh and not one Australian flag.
 
I am a migrant, born in Europe. I have been here for over 60 years, and I believe we need to acknowledge that, if 'Migrants' did not 'invade' Australia, the aborigines or First Nation People would not need to have to adapt to our ways of living. I appreciate Australia, and what it has given me and my family. We all know what migrants have contributed to our 'Lucky Country'. It is what it is today because of migrants. However, if Australia had not been invaded, the Aborigines would still be living their own lives and traditions, without constantly being treated (firstly as not being human - no voting rights etc.). They deserve to be acknowledged for what we, the white people, took from them. Their country. Their way of life. We introduced alcohol to them... we brought flora and fauna which ruined the eco system. Let us not celebrate and acknowledge that. Let us be honest. I love Australia, but I have never loved what was done to it First Nation People. Change Australia Day to another date... not to the day First Nation People had it all taken from them.
 
When will the virtue signallers wake up to the fact that we're ALL BLOODY AUSTRALIANS?! Why does any particular group need to be singled out for special recognition?

As to special recognition of immigrants, the entire population of Australia is made up of immigrants. In my own case, my paternal ancestors arrived in Australia from Ireland in the late 1800s and my maternal grandparents arrived in 1905 from Yorkshire. My paternal forebears bought land and established farms, contributing to the country, and my maternal grandfather opened an engineering business in Coffs Harbour, employing over 20 men. I'll guarantee that every person reading this has a similar story.

So should we only honour those migrants who arrived since WWII, or should we include the many hundreds of thousands of migrants who arrived in the country with little primary industry and no manufacturing industry? Those migrants, all now long dead, were the real heroes. They'd made the country attractive to overseas migrants who arrived in an already established and thriving nation. The platform was there to enable them to succeed. So no! 'I am, you are, we are Australian.' All of us!
 
Acknowledge everyone who made Australia what it is. The convicts brought here in chains with no say in the matter, the guards who had to come with them, the Chinese who serviced the goldmines, the Pacific Islanders who were kidnapped from their own countries to work the cane fields, the later immigrants who arrived from war ravaged Europe, quite often with only the clothes on their back and perhaps a suitcase, the ten pound Poms - the list goes on. They were NOT invaders!

And by the way, Cook may have "discovered" Australia, but he was at Botany Bay only for 8 days, then voyaging up the coast and altogether spending only 7 weeks on Australian soil. Settlement did not start for another 8 years, so stop blaming Capt Cook for "taking the country"
 
I am a migrant, born in Europe. I have been here for over 60 years, and I believe we need to acknowledge that, if 'Migrants' did not 'invade' Australia, the aborigines or First Nation People would not need to have to adapt to our ways of living. I appreciate Australia, and what it has given me and my family. We all know what migrants have contributed to our 'Lucky Country'. It is what it is today because of migrants. However, if Australia had not been invaded, the Aborigines would still be living their own lives and traditions, without constantly being treated (firstly as not being human - no voting rights etc.). They deserve to be acknowledged for what we, the white people, took from them. Their country. Their way of life. We introduced alcohol to them... we brought flora and fauna which ruined the eco system. Let us not celebrate and acknowledge that. Let us be honest. I love Australia, but I have never loved what was done to it First Nation People. Change Australia Day to another date... not to the day First Nation People had it all taken from them.
Firstly, the term 'First Nation' does not apply to the Australian Aborigine. In order to be a nation, there are criteria to fulfil: a common language, common customs, a leader and a seat of government to name a few. Our indigenous fulfil none of the criteria.

Secondly, how much more acknowledgment of the alleged colonial harm do you want to see? There was the much celebrated apology on Sydney Harbour Bridge, and since then, an inordinate number of celebration days devoted to the indigenous. And let us not forget Naidoc. An entire week of taxpayer funded virtue signalling on the part of the those who have a black armband view of our history. The $35b annual amount allocated to over 3,000 Aboriginal groups should be making a huge difference to their lives. Unfortunately, because there's no oversight of how the money's being spent, it falls into the hands of the 'Big Men' in each mob who distribute it to their family and chosen friends, so they can spend it on things like a brand new Land Cruiser for their son's 13th birthday. True story. Add to this the mining royalties, running into tens of millions, and I'd say that financially, the mobs have more than enough money to fund a lifestyle that improves their health and living conditions.

Now I know that you've made the decision that I'm racist. Full disclosure: I am the skin sister in law of Bess Price and skin sister of her husband, Dave. This means I'm Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's skin aunty. I have a deep knowledge of the customs and culture of Aborigines. My knowledge didn't come from the mainstream media, and it certainly didn't come from the fraudulent Bruce Pasco's laughable reimagining of Aboriginal lifestyles before white settlement. My knowledge came from the source and I can assure you that the genuine Aborigines, as opposed to the blacktivists in our cities, despise the WTC. They see it as an insult to their race and their genuine culture. Time to get rid of it!
 
Last edited:
I am a 'baby boomer', and as far as I can remember this was the only 'title' used to cover a particular group of persons. I grew up at a great time in this Country, we manufactured and exported a great deal of things to many parts of the world. Jobs were available to anyone who wanted to work and that included those persons who arrived from many parts of the world after the devastation caused by the War. The music was great along with the relaxing style of living outdoors and enjoying the beaches and country areas. Now, all I see is this Country turning to 'crap' and these are some of the reasons ie: inept Governments filled with people who don't have any qualifications to run anything, busy lining their pockets for little effort and setting themselves up for some senior position in a large company, or overseas posting when they retire. During their time in office they managed to sell off our businesses, dismantle them to such a level that they have to close, move off shore or import everything from overseas to keep their own pockets full. I did a Cadetship with AWA, North Ryde, that company was the biggest producer of electronics in the southern hemisphere and we manufactured and exported many unique items for the overseas market. Shortly after leaving, I returned to a re-union at the factory and most of the original factory had be converted to assembling fridges, washing machines and freezers, which were being imported from overseas. I found out that Whitlem had cancelled a lot of Gov. contracts with AWA and sent the contracts overseas, one guess where they went. As for migrants who came post war, they were the 'salt of the earth.' They brought with them a host of new flavours and styles of cooking and I thank them greatly for that. They were friendly, loved the life-style and the country and all it offered them. They worked hard and had the opportunity to flourish, without loosing their identity. Sure they created their distinctive areas to live however, they assimilated into our values and I am glad that they did this without protesting in the streets, throwing rocks, burning cars and vandalism. But, what is going on now... division, anger, hatred, racism, burning our flag, legislation that promotes division, Politicians pushing their own agender, mostly for minority groups, some of which brought their racial hatred of certain religions, a hatred of certain peoples, and lack of a common values that this Country has developed with. I know, there were injustices, mistakes made in those years of colonisation however, when Rudd made that apology on behalf of all Australians to the Indigenious populations, I agreed that was partly right however, I do not believe that all the
responsible persons for those mis-deeds spoke up ie: in those early years we were governed and under the control of England. They appointed our Governors, draughted our laws and appointed our Officials to run this Country. The second ruling body at that time was the Church who had a large say in how the local population was to be 'handled and administered.' So when Rudd gave his speech I don't remember seeing anyone representing the English Government, or from the Churches joining in to offer their apologies for what they had done.
I say let us not forget what has happened however, it would do us more good to move forward and not keep looking back. It is like an injury, if you keep picking at it, it will never heal.

As for now I will make the following comments based on my actual experiences having had my own business, serving in the Military and 39yrs as a Police Officer, 22yrs as a Detective working in various areas and Task Forces. I had interacted with people at many levels, Politicians, professional people, educators, white and blue collar workers and down to the lower levels that can only be described as 'rock spiders, deviates, oxygen thieves, crooks of all types and those awaiting burial'. We have appeared to have adopted this 'political correctness mantra' to the point where it has come back to bite us. Many countries overseas are dropping this as they are also going though this internal unrest, an increase of violent crime, poor Judicial outcomes and the break-down of morals and what we call here 'mateship.' Add to this some Politicians here think and worry, to the point of extreme, what other Countries will think of us if we don't appear a certain way. They are making decisions, mostly poor ones, that are not for the benefit for this Country and persons but on what other Countries or minority groups will say about us. Probably the biggest one is immigration. To put it bluntly, we are allowing persons into this Country who are criminals and are here for one reason only, to partake in criminal activities to make money for themselves no matter who they hurt. Weak laws allow this and any legislation the Gov. enacts is so full of loop-holes it is worthless. If a person arrives here illegally or uses a false/misleading document to gain entry should be held in custody and returned to his point of origin immediately. I am tired of seeing persons who have come here, obtained their citizenship and then belittled this Country or embark down the crime pathway should have their citizenship taken away and sent back to their country of origin. No appeals, no free legal aid (paid for by us), and any assets as a result of criminal activity should be confiscated. We hardly ever hear of this happening other than the 'cash or items' found here being held, what about the money that has been sent overseas.(Enabled by the Banks not being held to account).
Well I have had my say, sorry about the length however, I love this Country and the good people in it, I just want a Gov. that has the guts to keep this Country great and moving forward. I did my best to remove some of these criminals out however, only to be let down by the Judiciary with weak sentencing. I wish I was still there.
Have a great day everyone, smile and have a laugh, it helps.
 
Firstly, the term 'First Nation' does not apply to the Australian Aborigine. In order to be a nation, there are criteria to fulfil: a common language, common customs, a leader and a seat of government to name a few. Our indigenous fulfil none of the criteria.

Secondly, how much more acknowledgment of the alleged colonial harm do you want to see? There was the much celebrated apology on Sydney Harbour Bridge, and since then, an inordinate number of celebration days devoted to the indigenous. And let us not forget Naidoc. An entire week of taxpayer funded virtue signalling on the part of the those who have a black armband view of our history. The $35b annual amount allocated to over 3,000 Aboriginal groups should be making a huge difference to their lives. Unfortunately, because there's no oversight of how the money's being spent, it falls into the hands of the 'Big Men' in each mob who distribute it to their family and chosen friends, so they can spend it on things like a brand new Land Cruiser for their son's 13th birthday. True story. Add to this the mining royalties, running into tens of millions, and I'd say that financially, the mobs have more than enough money to fund a lifestyle that improves their health and living conditions.

Now I know that you've made the decision that I'm racist. Full disclosure: I am the skin sister in law of Bess Price and skin sister of her husband, Dave. This means I'm Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's skin aunty. I have a deep knowledge of the customs and culture of Aborigines. My knowledge didn't come from the mainstream media, and it certainly didn't come from the fraudulent Bruce Pasco's laughable reimagining of Aboriginal lifestyles before white settlement. My knowledge came from the source and I can assure you that the genuine Aborigines, as opposed to the blacktivists in our cities, despise the WTC. They see it as an insult to their race and their genuine culture. Time to get rid of it!
Thank you 🙏 for saying it as it is , time for some home truths .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joydie and kaybe
When will the virtue signallers wake up to the fact that we're ALL BLOODY AUSTRALIANS?! Why does any particular group need to be singled out for special recognition?

As to special recognition of immigrants, the entire population of Australia is made up of immigrants. In my own case, my paternal ancestors arrived in Australia from Ireland in the late 1800s and my maternal grandparents arrived in 1905 from Yorkshire. My paternal forebears bought land and established farms, contributing to the country, and my maternal grandfather opened an engineering business in Coffs Harbour, employing over 20 men. I'll guarantee that every person reading this has a similar story.

So should we only honour those migrants who arrived since WWII, or should we include the many hundreds of thousands of migrants who arrived in the country with little primary industry and no manufacturing industry? Those migrants, all now long dead, were the real heroes. They'd made the country attractive to overseas migrants who arrived in an already established and thriving nation. The platform was there to enable them to succeed. So no! 'I am, you are, we are Australian.' All of us!
Exactly Joydie, I am 5th generation on my Maternal side and 2nd on my Paternal side and we have all contributed to Australia. Why should those that came after WW2 be singled out? My grandfather, Father and uncle on my Maternal side fought for Australia! So all should be recognised!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I am a migrant, born in Europe. I have been here for over 60 years, and I believe we need to acknowledge that, if 'Migrants' did not 'invade' Australia, the aborigines or First Nation People would not need to have to adapt to our ways of living. I appreciate Australia, and what it has given me and my family. We all know what migrants have contributed to our 'Lucky Country'. It is what it is today because of migrants. However, if Australia had not been invaded, the Aborigines would still be living their own lives and traditions, without constantly being treated (firstly as not being human - no voting rights etc.). They deserve to be acknowledged for what we, the white people, took from them. Their country. Their way of life. We introduced alcohol to them... we brought flora and fauna which ruined the eco system. Let us not celebrate and acknowledge that. Let us be honest. I love Australia, but I have never loved what was done to it First Nation People. Change Australia Day to another date... not to the day First Nation People had it all taken from them.
We all came out of Africa in the distant past. That applies to Aboriginal people too. They didnt just drop out of the sky onto Australia. They didnt come in one mass migration. They came in small groups, gathering other peoples DNA, flora, languages and customs as they came. Like all people everywhere.
And Capt Cook did not take anything away from them on 26 January
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I am a 'baby boomer', and as far as I can remember this was the only 'title' used to cover a particular group of persons. I grew up at a great time in this Country, we manufactured and exported a great deal of things to many parts of the world. Jobs were available to anyone who wanted to work and that included those persons who arrived from many parts of the world after the devastation caused by the War. The music was great along with the relaxing style of living outdoors and enjoying the beaches and country areas. Now, all I see is this Country turning to 'crap' and these are some of the reasons ie: inept Governments filled with people who don't have any qualifications to run anything, busy lining their pockets for little effort and setting themselves up for some senior position in a large company, or overseas posting when they retire. During their time in office they managed to sell off our businesses, dismantle them to such a level that they have to close, move off shore or import everything from overseas to keep their own pockets full. I did a Cadetship with AWA, North Ryde, that company was the biggest producer of electronics in the southern hemisphere and we manufactured and exported many unique items for the overseas market. Shortly after leaving, I returned to a re-union at the factory and most of the original factory had be converted to assembling fridges, washing machines and freezers, which were being imported from overseas. I found out that Whitlem had cancelled a lot of Gov. contracts with AWA and sent the contracts overseas, one guess where they went. As for migrants who came post war, they were the 'salt of the earth.' They brought with them a host of new flavours and styles of cooking and I thank them greatly for that. They were friendly, loved the life-style and the country and all it offered them. They worked hard and had the opportunity to flourish, without loosing their identity. Sure they created their distinctive areas to live however, they assimilated into our values and I am glad that they did this without protesting in the streets, throwing rocks, burning cars and vandalism. But, what is going on now... division, anger, hatred, racism, burning our flag, legislation that promotes division, Politicians pushing their own agender, mostly for minority groups, some of which brought their racial hatred of certain religions, a hatred of certain peoples, and lack of a common values that this Country has developed with. I know, there were injustices, mistakes made in those years of colonisation however, when Rudd made that apology on behalf of all Australians to the Indigenious populations, I agreed that was partly right however, I do not believe that all the
responsible persons for those mis-deeds spoke up ie: in those early years we were governed and under the control of England. They appointed our Governors, draughted our laws and appointed our Officials to run this Country. The second ruling body at that time was the Church who had a large say in how the local population was to be 'handled and administered.' So when Rudd gave his speech I don't remember seeing anyone representing the English Government, or from the Churches joining in to offer their apologies for what they had done.
I say let us not forget what has happened however, it would do us more good to move forward and not keep looking back. It is like an injury, if you keep picking at it, it will never heal.

As for now I will make the following comments based on my actual experiences having had my own business, serving in the Military and 39yrs as a Police Officer, 22yrs as a Detective working in various areas and Task Forces. I had interacted with people at many levels, Politicians, professional people, educators, white and blue collar workers and down to the lower levels that can only be described as 'rock spiders, deviates, oxygen thieves, crooks of all types and those awaiting burial'. We have appeared to have adopted this 'political correctness mantra' to the point where it has come back to bite us. Many countries overseas are dropping this as they are also going though this internal unrest, an increase of violent crime, poor Judicial outcomes and the break-down of morals and what we call here 'mateship.' Add to this some Politicians here think and worry, to the point of extreme, what other Countries will think of us if we don't appear a certain way. They are making decisions, mostly poor ones, that are not for the benefit for this Country and persons but on what other Countries or minority groups will say about us. Probably the biggest one is immigration. To put it bluntly, we are allowing persons into this Country who are criminals and are here for one reason only, to partake in criminal activities to make money for themselves no matter who they hurt. Weak laws allow this and any legislation the Gov. enacts is so full of loop-holes it is worthless. If a person arrives here illegally or uses a false/misleading document to gain entry should be held in custody and returned to his point of origin immediately. I am tired of seeing persons who have come here, obtained their citizenship and then belittled this Country or embark down the crime pathway should have their citizenship taken away and sent back to their country of origin. No appeals, no free legal aid (paid for by us), and any assets as a result of criminal activity should be confiscated. We hardly ever hear of this happening other than the 'cash or items' found here being held, what about the money that has been sent overseas.(Enabled by the Banks not being held to account).
Well I have had my say, sorry about the length however, I love this Country and the good people in it, I just want a Gov. that has the guts to keep this Country great and moving forward. I did my best to remove some of these criminals out however, only to be let down by the Judiciary with weak sentencing. I wish I was still there.
Have a great day everyone, smile and have a laugh, it helps.
Thank you for your service and telling people the facts as some need to be told what is happening to our once great country, hopefully many will wake up before it’s too late, one can only hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Welcome to country is a falsehood propagated by the WOKE SNOWFLAKEs that are trying to pass off and old Welcome used by aboriginal tribes to travellers who wanted to pass through their territory
It has no meaning or value in modern society, this the country belong to all who live here. Because all who live here now have rejected this WOKE chant, don't try to foist it onto new migrants, just to satisfy your warped and conceited egos. ❄ ❄❄❄❄❄ :ninja: :ninja: :ninja: :ninja: 👿👿👿👿👿💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy and Leenie
I am a 'baby boomer', and as far as I can remember this was the only 'title' used to cover a particular group of persons. I grew up at a great time in this Country, we manufactured and exported a great deal of things to many parts of the world. Jobs were available to anyone who wanted to work and that included those persons who arrived from many parts of the world after the devastation caused by the War. The music was great along with the relaxing style of living outdoors and enjoying the beaches and country areas. Now, all I see is this Country turning to 'crap' and these are some of the reasons ie: inept Governments filled with people who don't have any qualifications to run anything, busy lining their pockets for little effort and setting themselves up for some senior position in a large company, or overseas posting when they retire. During their time in office they managed to sell off our businesses, dismantle them to such a level that they have to close, move off shore or import everything from overseas to keep their own pockets full. I did a Cadetship with AWA, North Ryde, that company was the biggest producer of electronics in the southern hemisphere and we manufactured and exported many unique items for the overseas market. Shortly after leaving, I returned to a re-union at the factory and most of the original factory had be converted to assembling fridges, washing machines and freezers, which were being imported from overseas. I found out that Whitlem had cancelled a lot of Gov. contracts with AWA and sent the contracts overseas, one guess where they went. As for migrants who came post war, they were the 'salt of the earth.' They brought with them a host of new flavours and styles of cooking and I thank them greatly for that. They were friendly, loved the life-style and the country and all it offered them. They worked hard and had the opportunity to flourish, without loosing their identity. Sure they created their distinctive areas to live however, they assimilated into our values and I am glad that they did this without protesting in the streets, throwing rocks, burning cars and vandalism. But, what is going on now... division, anger, hatred, racism, burning our flag, legislation that promotes division, Politicians pushing their own agender, mostly for minority groups, some of which brought their racial hatred of certain religions, a hatred of certain peoples, and lack of a common values that this Country has developed with. I know, there were injustices, mistakes made in those years of colonisation however, when Rudd made that apology on behalf of all Australians to the Indigenious populations, I agreed that was partly right however, I do not believe that all the
responsible persons for those mis-deeds spoke up ie: in those early years we were governed and under the control of England. They appointed our Governors, draughted our laws and appointed our Officials to run this Country. The second ruling body at that time was the Church who had a large say in how the local population was to be 'handled and administered.' So when Rudd gave his speech I don't remember seeing anyone representing the English Government, or from the Churches joining in to offer their apologies for what they had done.
I say let us not forget what has happened however, it would do us more good to move forward and not keep looking back. It is like an injury, if you keep picking at it, it will never heal.

As for now I will make the following comments based on my actual experiences having had my own business, serving in the Military and 39yrs as a Police Officer, 22yrs as a Detective working in various areas and Task Forces. I had interacted with people at many levels, Politicians, professional people, educators, white and blue collar workers and down to the lower levels that can only be described as 'rock spiders, deviates, oxygen thieves, crooks of all types and those awaiting burial'. We have appeared to have adopted this 'political correctness mantra' to the point where it has come back to bite us. Many countries overseas are dropping this as they are also going though this internal unrest, an increase of violent crime, poor Judicial outcomes and the break-down of morals and what we call here 'mateship.' Add to this some Politicians here think and worry, to the point of extreme, what other Countries will think of us if we don't appear a certain way. They are making decisions, mostly poor ones, that are not for the benefit for this Country and persons but on what other Countries or minority groups will say about us. Probably the biggest one is immigration. To put it bluntly, we are allowing persons into this Country who are criminals and are here for one reason only, to partake in criminal activities to make money for themselves no matter who they hurt. Weak laws allow this and any legislation the Gov. enacts is so full of loop-holes it is worthless. If a person arrives here illegally or uses a false/misleading document to gain entry should be held in custody and returned to his point of origin immediately. I am tired of seeing persons who have come here, obtained their citizenship and then belittled this Country or embark down the crime pathway should have their citizenship taken away and sent back to their country of origin. No appeals, no free legal aid (paid for by us), and any assets as a result of criminal activity should be confiscated. We hardly ever hear of this happening other than the 'cash or items' found here being held, what about the money that has been sent overseas.(Enabled by the Banks not being held to account).
Well I have had my say, sorry about the length however, I love this Country and the good people in it, I just want a Gov. that has the guts to keep this Country great and moving forward. I did my best to remove some of these criminals out however, only to be let down by the Judiciary with weak sentencing. I wish I was still there.
Have a great day everyone, smile and have a laugh, it helps.
I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of most of the modern crop of politicians.

I'm not sure if you're aware of the 'Post Turtle' analogy. The story concerns an old farmer telling his doctor why he believes most politicians are Post Turtles. When asked to clarify, he said words to the effect of: 'You're driving along and you see a turtle on top of a fence post. You stop to try and understand this odd sight. You reach the conclusions that, it didn't get up there by itself, it doesn't belong there, it has no idea what to do now it's up there, and, having been unnaturally elevated beyond its ability to function, it's never going to get anything done while it's up there. Finally, you wonder what kind of idiot put it up there in the first place!' A pretty fair analogy in my eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I am torn with these acknowledgements.street name changes but one.
The one that gripes me ? The Traditional owners. we don’t own a blade of grass.
But something that applies to every soul on this beautiful land. Carrtakers. We are all from the beginning caretakers. Colour race notwithstanding
 
  • Like
Reactions: Milica
Firstly, the term 'First Nation' does not apply to the Australian Aborigine. In order to be a nation, there are criteria to fulfil: a common language, common customs, a leader and a seat of government to name a few. Our indigenous fulfil none of the criteria.

Secondly, how much more acknowledgment of the alleged colonial harm do you want to see? There was the much celebrated apology on Sydney Harbour Bridge, and since then, an inordinate number of celebration days devoted to the indigenous. And let us not forget Naidoc. An entire week of taxpayer funded virtue signalling on the part of the those who have a black armband view of our history. The $35b annual amount allocated to over 3,000 Aboriginal groups should be making a huge difference to their lives. Unfortunately, because there's no oversight of how the money's being spent, it falls into the hands of the 'Big Men' in each mob who distribute it to their family and chosen friends, so they can spend it on things like a brand new Land Cruiser for their son's 13th birthday. True story. Add to this the mining royalties, running into tens of millions, and I'd say that financially, the mobs have more than enough money to fund a lifestyle that improves their health and living conditions.

Now I know that you've made the decision that I'm racist. Full disclosure: I am the skin sister in law of Bess Price and skin sister of her husband, Dave. This means I'm Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's skin aunty. I have a deep knowledge of the customs and culture of Aborigines. My knowledge didn't come from the mainstream media, and it certainly didn't come from the fraudulent Bruce Pasco's laughable reimagining of Aboriginal lifestyles before white settlement. My knowledge came from the source and I can assure you that the genuine Aborigines, as opposed to the blacktivists in our cities, despise the WTC. They see it as an insult to their race and their genuine culture. Time to get rid of it!
Hi Joydie - you do like a good ‘dog whistle’ don’t you? So I understand you’re making a political argument rather than a linguistic or anthropological one, so let’s be clear on what terms and facts you are actually discussing.
The term First Nations doesn’t mean a single, centralised state. It’s plural because it recognises the hundreds of distinct sovereign societies that existed before colonisation, each with its own laws, languages, and governance systems. The criteria you list:- “common language, single government, capital”, describe a European model of nationhood, not the Indigenous concept. By that logic, the ancient Greeks or Norse peoples wouldn’t qualify as nations either.

That $35 billion gets thrown around as if it’s a slush fund, but it actually covers hospitals, schools, housing, policing, and other services - but I’m sure you know that. The suggestion that it’s all ending up in the hands of a few ‘Big Men’ buying Land Cruisers is an unverified anecdote - a classic dog-whistle. Can we make something out of - “Jacinta Price has pushed for funding like the $12 million Tennant Creek school redevelopment, where her mother, Bess Price, is a paid executive”… part of the same funding pool?

So when you use family ties or assimilation stories to claim insider authority, it’s important to acknowledge the setting those stories were built in. Missionary schools and protection policies were not neutral — they were instruments of control. Some families survived and even found opportunity within them, but those same structures caused deep loss for countless others. To use that survival as proof that colonisation was somehow beneficial is to misunderstand both the cost and the context.

What is troubling to me, is that this narrative often creates a no-win situation for Indigenous people today. When communities struggle, they’re accused of wasting money or failing to integrate. When they thrive - through art, education, enterprise, or even cultural practices like the Welcome to Country - they’re accused of profiteering or virtue signalling. It’s as if Indigenous effort is only acceptable when it’s invisible?
 
Hi Joydie - you do like a good ‘dog whistle’ don’t you? So I understand you’re making a political argument rather than a linguistic or anthropological one, so let’s be clear on what terms and facts you are actually discussing.
The term First Nations doesn’t mean a single, centralised state. It’s plural because it recognises the hundreds of distinct sovereign societies that existed before colonisation, each with its own laws, languages, and governance systems. The criteria you list:- “common language, single government, capital”, describe a European model of nationhood, not the Indigenous concept. By that logic, the ancient Greeks or Norse peoples wouldn’t qualify as nations either.

That $35 billion gets thrown around as if it’s a slush fund, but it actually covers hospitals, schools, housing, policing, and other services - but I’m sure you know that. The suggestion that it’s all ending up in the hands of a few ‘Big Men’ buying Land Cruisers is an unverified anecdote - a classic dog-whistle. Can we make something out of - “Jacinta Price has pushed for funding like the $12 million Tennant Creek school redevelopment, where her mother, Bess Price, is a paid executive”… part of the same funding pool?

So when you use family ties or assimilation stories to claim insider authority, it’s important to acknowledge the setting those stories were built in. Missionary schools and protection policies were not neutral — they were instruments of control. Some families survived and even found opportunity within them, but those same structures caused deep loss for countless others. To use that survival as proof that colonisation was somehow beneficial is to misunderstand both the cost and the context.

What is troubling to me, is that this narrative often creates a no-win situation for Indigenous people today. When communities struggle, they’re accused of wasting money or failing to integrate. When they thrive - through art, education, enterprise, or even cultural practices like the Welcome to Country - they’re accused of profiteering or virtue signalling. It’s as if Indigenous effort is only acceptable when it’s invisible?
You are making a political statement too!
Of the $33.4 billion total that is thrown around, 18 per cent ($6 billion) was for Indigenous-specific expenditure. This refers to services and programs exclusively designed for and targeted at Indigenous people, such as Abstudy and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander legal aid. As for schools, hospitals, housing etc - that comes out of general revenue.
The concept of nationhood, is indeed a European concept, because you cannot have a "nation" that consists of a few family groupings that hunt and gather and live a peripatetic lifestyle. (I do not like to misuse "nomadic" which implies herding of domesticated animals)
So lets not talk about "First Nation" lets refer to "First People" (tho even that is under debate)


And by the way, ALL schools are instruments of control
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
You are making a political statement too!
Of the $33.4 billion total that is thrown around, 18 per cent ($6 billion) was for Indigenous-specific expenditure. This refers to services and programs exclusively designed for and targeted at Indigenous people, such as Abstudy and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander legal aid. As for schools, hospitals, housing etc - that comes out of general revenue.
The concept of nationhood, is indeed a European concept, because you cannot have a "nation" that consists of a few family groupings that hunt and gather and live a peripatetic lifestyle. (I do not like to misuse "nomadic" which implies herding of domesticated animals)
So lets not talk about "First Nation" lets refer to "First People" (tho even that is under debate)


And by the way, ALL schools are instruments of control
Thanks for jumping in Wildroseforever. I acknowledged the political statement and replied to Joydie…yeah? I feel you want to jump down my throat, regardless?
Yes, about 18% is Indigenous-specific, but the remaining 82% goes to general services—schools, hospitals, housing, policing - that Indigenous Australians also benefit from. So the idea of a $35 billion slush fund is still false.
First Nations = hundreds of societies with laws, languages, governance long before Europeans arrived. Not a “nation-state” in a European sense.
Terminology matters: “First Nations” emphasises sovereignty; “First People” is also used.
Surviving colonial systems doesn’t rewrite the history of systemic harm.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×